918 ms in total
234 ms
594 ms
90 ms
Click here to check amazing Live Score content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livescore.ws
Get Live Football Scores and Real-Time Football Results with LiveScore! We cover all Countries, Leagues and Competitions in unbeatable detail. Click Now!
Visit livescore.wsWe analyzed Livescore.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 234 ms and then it took 684 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
livescore.ws performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
92/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value2,220 ms
6/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
234 ms
60 ms
7 ms
10 ms
120 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Livescore.ws, 65% (22 requests) were made to Livescore.com and 15% (5 requests) were made to Static.livescore.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (234 ms) belongs to the original domain Livescore.ws.
Page size can be reduced by 47.6 kB (46%)
103.1 kB
55.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Livescore.ws main page is 103.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 64.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Live Score images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 82 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livescore.ws has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (44%)
32
18
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Live Score. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
livescore.ws
234 ms
60 ms
3cecf1616e5ed335.css
7 ms
6fa2c92354d29942.css
10 ms
ec5a7f4f2f349bf9.css
120 ms
ef0f6b49444006a4.css
15 ms
polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js
19 ms
2749.47e7e392d8d78283.js
160 ms
webpack-95f74752941cb7bc.js
15 ms
framework-e5b12c291073d220.js
18 ms
main-c00f735e55679d8a.js
17 ms
_app-aa22e525c3e3fbe7.js
232 ms
commons-1df94b5b581629ef.js
23 ms
8404-cf13c45acc4e30d9.js
21 ms
index-00d21c60bc35b0da.js
178 ms
_buildManifest.js
24 ms
_ssgManifest.js
178 ms
173 ms
england.jpg
164 ms
10260.png
131 ms
champions-league.jpg
143 ms
spain.jpg
146 ms
italy.jpg
148 ms
germany.jpg
147 ms
hamburger-menu-9cad5b5ae1902e5639d4bc8339cd756f.svg
51 ms
livescore-logo-b3b211143dccd9e22d164701d32a390f.svg
50 ms
mobile-search-2b729ef15856930595249a3c2bab7161.svg
49 ms
live-0c42a2dafa221e65966f71da84877f00.svg
139 ms
calendar-62a86ad26c51fe49ea1c6abb202a15b4.svg
51 ms
close-23b5358e55b7af37c1a12881e8f6745d.svg
53 ms
8650.png
135 ms
9825.png
128 ms
8633.png
134 ms
8634.png
134 ms
livescore.ws accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
livescore.ws best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
livescore.ws SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livescore.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livescore.ws main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livescore.ws
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Live Score. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: