Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

livespecial.com

Livespecial | Access Support Services for Families with a Loved One with Special Needs

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

480 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

588 ms

livespecial.com screenshot

About Website

Visit livespecial.com now to see the best up-to-date Livespecial content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livespecial.com

Visit livespecial.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Livespecial.com page load time and found that the first response time was 480 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livespecial.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.052

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

livespecial.com

480 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

165 ms

style.min.css

184 ms

pagenavi-css.css

243 ms

leaflet.css

517 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Livespecial.com, 19% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Livespecial.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 180.5 kB (4%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

4.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Livespecial.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 139.2 kB

  • Original 166.3 kB
  • After minification 159.6 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 4.2 MB
  • After minification 4.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livespecial images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 32.7 kB

  • Original 133.7 kB
  • After minification 133.7 kB
  • After compression 101.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.7 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 109.9 kB
  • After minification 107.7 kB
  • After compression 103.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livespecial.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (83%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livespecial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

livespecial.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

livespecial.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

livespecial.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livespecial.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livespecial.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livespecial. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: