11.7 sec in total
563 ms
10.8 sec
361 ms
Click here to check amazing Livestream Lines content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livestreamlines.com
We provide professional time lapse video production services across UAE. Our well-equipped team offer site survey, installation & timely delivery of quality time lapse videos.
Visit livestreamlines.comWe analyzed Livestreamlines.com page load time and found that the first response time was 563 ms and then it took 11.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
livestreamlines.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value16.5 s
0/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value450 ms
62/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
563 ms
848 ms
774 ms
58 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Livestreamlines.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Livestreamlines.com.
Page size can be reduced by 103.9 kB (2%)
4.9 MB
4.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Livestreamlines.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.0 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livestream Lines images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 56.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.3 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livestreamlines.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (50%)
62
31
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livestream Lines. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
livestreamlines.com
563 ms
livestreamlines.com
848 ms
bootstrap.min.css
774 ms
font-awesome.min.css
58 ms
css
39 ms
font-awesome.min.css
817 ms
jquery.circliful.css
831 ms
style.css
824 ms
slick.css
823 ms
slick-theme.css
858 ms
stylesheet.css
1518 ms
carouselTicker.css
1586 ms
logo.png
1671 ms
embed
315 ms
jquery.js
2069 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1666 ms
onepagenav.js
1667 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
2269 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
2349 ms
jquery.circliful.js
2345 ms
jquery.tubular.1.0.html
2344 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
2363 ms
okvideo.js
2811 ms
vimeo_control.js
3026 ms
docs.min.js
3130 ms
js
64 ms
gmap3.js
3090 ms
jquery-2.2.0.min.js
60 ms
slick.js
3129 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
jquery.carouselTicker.min.js
3102 ms
start.js
3572 ms
js
113 ms
g-1.jpg
4803 ms
g-2.jpg
4613 ms
g-3.jpg
4841 ms
g-4.jpg
4821 ms
g-5.jpg
4712 ms
g-6.jpg
5107 ms
g-7.jpg
6281 ms
g-8.jpg
6190 ms
g-9.jpg
6261 ms
g-10.jpg
6295 ms
g-11.jpg
6316 ms
g-12.jpg
6317 ms
js
34 ms
search.js
3 ms
geometry.js
6 ms
main.js
11 ms
g-13.jpg
6870 ms
g-14.jpg
6909 ms
g-15.jpg
6935 ms
css
33 ms
g-16.jpg
6698 ms
feature_image.png
6245 ms
Expo-2020-Logo.png
6479 ms
bg01.jpg
7214 ms
bg02.jpg
7212 ms
bg001.jpg
7630 ms
bg002.jpg
7708 ms
font
10 ms
fontawesome-webfontba72.woff
7071 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
19 ms
font
29 ms
line01.png
6400 ms
line04.png
6953 ms
livestreamlines.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
livestreamlines.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
livestreamlines.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livestreamlines.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livestreamlines.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livestreamlines.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livestream Lines. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: