Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

livetester.info

看護師特有のストレスと対処法 - ストレスに対処せよ!

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

95 ms

livetester.info screenshot

About Website

Welcome to livetester.info homepage info - get ready to check Livetester best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about livetester.info

看護師は、日々多くの患者と接したり、体力の負担が大きい業務を任されたりと、様々な場面でストレスが溜まりやすい職種のひとつです。そのため、働きやすい職場を選んだり、自分なりのストレス解消法を見つけたりすることが重要です。

Visit livetester.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Livetester.info page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livetester.info performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

livetester.info

1689 ms

style.min.css

872 ms

css

22 ms

style.css

203 ms

icomoon.css

353 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Livetester.info, 13% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Livetester.info.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 286.2 kB (78%)

Content Size

365.4 kB

After Optimization

79.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Livetester.info main page is 365.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 171.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 28.8 kB

  • Original 38.0 kB
  • After minification 35.8 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 109.6 kB

  • Original 156.1 kB
  • After minification 136.7 kB
  • After compression 46.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 147.7 kB

  • Original 171.3 kB
  • After minification 155.1 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livetester.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 147.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (82%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livetester. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

livetester.info accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

livetester.info best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

livetester.info SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livetester.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livetester.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: