Tools & Wizards About Us
living-room.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

living-room.co

Living Room Treehouse Experience | Wales | living-room.co

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

249 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

59 ms

living-room.co screenshot

About Website

Visit living-room.co now to see the best up-to-date Living Room content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about living-room.co

Magical Treehouse Holidays, in the stunning Welsh countryside. Remote, beautiful and completely unique.

Visit living-room.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Living-room.co page load time and found that the first response time was 249 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

living-room.co performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.living-room.co

249 ms

minified.js

32 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

63 ms

polyfill.min.js

27 ms

thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Living-room.co, 40% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 34% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (285 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 273.8 kB (38%)

Content Size

718.8 kB

After Optimization

445.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Living-room.co main page is 718.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 357.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 268.6 kB

  • Original 357.7 kB
  • After minification 356.1 kB
  • After compression 89.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 268.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 116.2 kB
  • After minification 114.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Living Room images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 244.9 kB
  • After minification 244.9 kB
  • After compression 241.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (50%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Living Room. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.living-room.co

www.living-room.co

249 ms

minified.js

minified.js

32 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

63 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

27 ms

thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js

99 ms

main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js

main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js

101 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

97 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

100 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

98 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

101 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

100 ms

5628bb_4d0cd0646a11421fb73fe666b6ad8f4b.jpg

5628bb_4d0cd0646a11421fb73fe666b6ad8f4b.jpg

285 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

51 ms

5628bb_90aaa8747c4047c1b51956715c66a780~mv2.png

5628bb_90aaa8747c4047c1b51956715c66a780~mv2.png

196 ms

5628bb_0020eb54f1894909957e09313415b930.jpg

5628bb_0020eb54f1894909957e09313415b930.jpg

260 ms

LPlite.png

LPlite.png

221 ms

Row%201.png

Row%201.png

284 ms

127 ms

121 ms

122 ms

117 ms

115 ms

116 ms

130 ms

146 ms

146 ms

144 ms

141 ms

147 ms

0c0f4d28-4c13-4e84-9a36-e63cd529ae86.woff

0c0f4d28-4c13-4e84-9a36-e63cd529ae86.woff

4 ms

4e5713c6-f9bf-44d7-bc17-775b7c102f1c.woff

4e5713c6-f9bf-44d7-bc17-775b7c102f1c.woff

6 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

24 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

6 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

7 ms

Accessibility Review

living-room.co accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

living-room.co best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

living-room.co SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Living-room.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Living-room.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

living-room.co

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Living Room. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: