Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

livinghistory.ru

Форум Военно-Исторических Реконструкторов

Page Load Speed

8 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

816 ms

livinghistory.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit livinghistory.ru now to see the best up-to-date Livinghistory content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livinghistory.ru

реконструкция

Visit livinghistory.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Livinghistory.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livinghistory.ru performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

livinghistory.ru

2015 ms

ipb_help.css

264 ms

ipb_mlist_addon.css

262 ms

ipb_styles.css

794 ms

calendar_select.css

275 ms

Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Livinghistory.ru, 4% (5 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Livinghistory.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 546.6 kB (43%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

716.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Livinghistory.ru main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 659.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 185.6 kB

  • Original 211.9 kB
  • After minification 167.9 kB
  • After compression 26.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 44.0 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 185.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 65.8 kB

  • Original 659.6 kB
  • After minification 593.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livinghistory images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 238.1 kB

  • Original 318.4 kB
  • After minification 259.5 kB
  • After compression 80.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 238.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 57.1 kB

  • Original 72.8 kB
  • After minification 72.0 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livinghistory.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 57.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (25%)

Requests Now

110

After Optimization

83

The browser has sent 110 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livinghistory. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

livinghistory.ru accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

livinghistory.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

livinghistory.ru SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livinghistory.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Livinghistory.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Livinghistory. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: