Tools & Wizards About Us
livinghope.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

livinghope.org

INICIO - Instituto Naciones

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

127 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

617 ms

livinghope.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Livinghope content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livinghope.org

Living Hope Youth Home. Our mission is to rescue children, train leaders, and reach the nations with the Gospel.

Visit livinghope.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Livinghope.org page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livinghope.org performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.2 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.6 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

livinghope.org

127 ms

livinghope.org

1573 ms

styles.css

156 ms

give-donation-summary.css

160 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

165 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Livinghope.org, 12% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Livinghope.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 220.6 kB (11%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Livinghope.org main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 974.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 189.7 kB

  • Original 370.4 kB
  • After minification 365.0 kB
  • After compression 180.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 189.7 kB or 51% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 974.4 kB
  • After minification 962.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livinghope images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 541.8 kB
  • After minification 541.8 kB
  • After compression 535.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 12.2 kB

  • Original 161.7 kB
  • After minification 161.0 kB
  • After compression 149.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livinghope.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (87%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livinghope. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

livinghope.org

livinghope.org

127 ms

livinghope.org

livinghope.org

1573 ms

styles.css

styles.css

156 ms

give-donation-summary.css

give-donation-summary.css

160 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

165 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

160 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

157 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

196 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

1556 ms

base.css

base.css

209 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

212 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

216 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

213 ms

post-147.css

post-147.css

247 ms

css

css

36 ms

lightgallery.min.css

lightgallery.min.css

261 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

265 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

263 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

270 ms

icon-custom.css

icon-custom.css

300 ms

style.css

style.css

312 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

324 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

319 ms

template.css

template.css

330 ms

style.css

style.css

353 ms

custom_script.css

custom_script.css

364 ms

css

css

32 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

370 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

371 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

384 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

404 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

416 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

424 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

424 ms

give.js

give.js

444 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

457 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

470 ms

perfect-scrollbar.jquery.min.js

perfect-scrollbar.jquery.min.js

477 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

478 ms

99 ms

css

css

24 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

363 ms

post-206.css

post-206.css

1589 ms

widget-spacer.min.css

widget-spacer.min.css

373 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

380 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

376 ms

widget-divider.min.css

widget-divider.min.css

394 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

390 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

392 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

379 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

403 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

420 ms

lightgallery.min.js

lightgallery.min.js

399 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

393 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

405 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

425 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

429 ms

main.js

main.js

407 ms

woocommerce.js

woocommerce.js

409 ms

add-to-cart.js

add-to-cart.js

420 ms

index.js

index.js

421 ms

index.js

index.js

425 ms

main.js

main.js

420 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

438 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

493 ms

give-donation-summary.js

give-donation-summary.js

444 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

440 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

449 ms

count-to.js

count-to.js

453 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

454 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

482 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

475 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

464 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

462 ms

LivingHopeB-200.png

LivingHopeB-200.png

83 ms

LivingHopeW-300.png

LivingHopeW-300.png

83 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

83 ms

homesponsor02.jpg

homesponsor02.jpg

245 ms

werescue.jpg

werescue.jpg

472 ms

wetrain.jpg

wetrain.jpg

424 ms

wereach.jpg

wereach.jpg

472 ms

LivingHopeW-200.png

LivingHopeW-200.png

372 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

58 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

92 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

217 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff

247 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff

268 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

266 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

267 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff

268 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff

267 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtU.woff

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtU.woff

268 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtU.woff

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtU.woff

269 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsunDXbtU.woff

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsunDXbtU.woff

269 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

357 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

395 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

251 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

198 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

266 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

217 ms

image-placeholder.png

image-placeholder.png

56 ms

css

css

29 ms

9dd4e43a-c7f0-4aab-bbf2-490e8d9a0d29

9dd4e43a-c7f0-4aab-bbf2-490e8d9a0d29

78 ms

device.js

device.js

36 ms

Accessibility Review

livinghope.org accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

livinghope.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

livinghope.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livinghope.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Livinghope.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

livinghope.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Livinghope. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: