Tools & Wizards About Us
livingreviews.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

livingreviews.org

Living Reviews in Relativity | Home

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

397 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

161 ms

livingreviews.org screenshot

About Website

Visit livingreviews.org now to see the best up-to-date Living Reviews content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livingreviews.org

Living Reviews in Relativity is a platinum open-access journal that publishes invited reviews of research in all areas of relativity. Unique in maintaining ...

Visit livingreviews.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Livingreviews.org page load time and found that the first response time was 397 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livingreviews.org performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.23

54/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

livingreviews.org

397 ms

css

25 ms

css

36 ms

skidoo_redux.css

282 ms

skidoo_redux_theme.css

280 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Livingreviews.org, 18% (6 requests) were made to Google.com and 15% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Livingreviews.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 315.3 kB (72%)

Content Size

436.8 kB

After Optimization

121.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Livingreviews.org main page is 436.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 314.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 19.1 kB
  • After minification 16.9 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

  • Original 37.9 kB
  • After minification 23.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Living Reviews needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.9 kB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 226.3 kB

  • Original 314.8 kB
  • After minification 307.4 kB
  • After compression 88.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 226.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 59.8 kB

  • Original 64.9 kB
  • After minification 18.2 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livingreviews.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 59.8 kB or 92% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (57%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Living Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

livingreviews.org

livingreviews.org

397 ms

css

css

25 ms

css

css

36 ms

skidoo_redux.css

skidoo_redux.css

282 ms

skidoo_redux_theme.css

skidoo_redux_theme.css

280 ms

google-feed-api.css

google-feed-api.css

291 ms

ruthsarian_utilities.js

ruthsarian_utilities.js

405 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

725 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

1035 ms

jsapi

jsapi

23 ms

randomize.js

randomize.js

371 ms

visual_consistencies.css

visual_consistencies.css

97 ms

rmenu.css

rmenu.css

199 ms

15 ms

skidoo_redux_print.css

skidoo_redux_print.css

97 ms

default+en.I.js

default+en.I.js

4 ms

logo_lrr_small.gif

logo_lrr_small.gif

221 ms

logo_lrsp_small.gif

logo_lrsp_small.gif

305 ms

logo_lrca_small.gif

logo_lrca_small.gif

304 ms

top-big.png

top-big.png

96 ms

bar-lrr.png

bar-lrr.png

106 ms

expand-right.gif

expand-right.gif

102 ms

bar-lrsp.png

bar-lrsp.png

105 ms

bar-lrca.png

bar-lrca.png

93 ms

logo_springer.png

logo_springer.png

259 ms

rss.gif

rss.gif

187 ms

font

font

146 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

163 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

174 ms

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf

171 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf

173 ms

Gfeeds

Gfeeds

55 ms

Gfeeds

Gfeeds

80 ms

Gfeeds

Gfeeds

669 ms

Accessibility Review

livingreviews.org accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Best Practices

livingreviews.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

livingreviews.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livingreviews.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livingreviews.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

livingreviews.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Living Reviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: