1.7 sec in total
102 ms
1.2 sec
437 ms
Click here to check amazing Livings Life Science content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livingslifescience.com
Marketing strategy uncommon consultancy by leveraging a foundation of over 19 years inside Fortune 500 pharmaceutical, biotech, and medical businesses
Visit livingslifescience.comWe analyzed Livingslifescience.com page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
livingslifescience.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value2,280 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
102 ms
105 ms
176 ms
26 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Livingslifescience.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (514 ms) belongs to the original domain Livingslifescience.com.
Page size can be reduced by 245.9 kB (19%)
1.3 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Livingslifescience.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 706.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 168 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livings Life Science images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 148.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 148.5 kB or 21% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livingslifescience.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (73%)
74
20
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livings Life Science. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
livingslifescience.com
102 ms
style.min.css
105 ms
styles.css
176 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
26 ms
style.css
28 ms
app.css
198 ms
grid-system.css
178 ms
style.css
40 ms
header-layout-centered-menu-under-logo.css
39 ms
cf7.css
52 ms
css
47 ms
responsive.css
48 ms
skin-original.css
219 ms
menu-dynamic.css
60 ms
js_composer.min.css
69 ms
a3_lazy_load.min.css
80 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
95 ms
style.css
106 ms
Defaults.css
225 ms
ultimate.min.css
123 ms
icons.css
141 ms
jquery.min.js
149 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
160 ms
core.min.js
172 ms
ultimate.min.js
462 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
189 ms
ajax-filter-posts.js
303 ms
js
68 ms
createjs-2015.11.26.min.js
106 ms
animation.js
198 ms
style-non-critical.css
262 ms
magnific.css
211 ms
core.css
220 ms
index.js
243 ms
index.js
242 ms
app.js
320 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
242 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
249 ms
priority.js
251 ms
api.js
44 ms
transit.min.js
275 ms
waypoints.js
418 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
514 ms
hoverintent.min.js
256 ms
magnific.js
260 ms
anime.min.js
273 ms
superfish.js
396 ms
init.js
276 ms
touchswipe.min.js
361 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
266 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
256 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
264 ms
index.js
274 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
252 ms
logo.png
308 ms
dual-pronged.png
250 ms
BIOTECH-OFF.png
307 ms
MEDICAL-DEVICES-OFF.png
307 ms
DIAGNOSTIC-LAB-OFF.png
248 ms
VC-STARTUP-OFF.png
248 ms
HEALTHCARE-IT-OFF.png
307 ms
philips-4.jpg
307 ms
invetech.jpg
307 ms
bd-tva-medical.jpg
379 ms
cordis.jpg
378 ms
vizi.jpg
378 ms
LLSS-logo-footer.svg
307 ms
sub-banner-bg.jpg
429 ms
js
82 ms
analytics.js
34 ms
hinted-CenturyGothic.woff
310 ms
hinted-CenturyGothic-Bold.woff
384 ms
icomoon.woff
420 ms
collect
31 ms
quote-open.png
326 ms
quote-close.png
324 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
34 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
118 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
175 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
176 ms
hinted-AvenirNext-DemiBoldItalic.woff
380 ms
hinted-AvenirNext-DemiBold.woff
381 ms
recaptcha__en.js
89 ms
logo.png
111 ms
livingslifescience.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
livingslifescience.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
livingslifescience.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livingslifescience.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livingslifescience.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livingslifescience.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Livings Life Science. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: