3.3 sec in total
637 ms
2.3 sec
357 ms
Visit livingtuts.com now to see the best up-to-date Livingtuts content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livingtuts.com
This website is for sale! livingtuts.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, livingtuts.com ...
Visit livingtuts.comWe analyzed Livingtuts.com page load time and found that the first response time was 637 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
livingtuts.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0.8 s
100/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.208
60/100
15%
Value3.0 s
95/100
10%
637 ms
349 ms
508 ms
352 ms
273 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Livingtuts.com, 70% (71 requests) were made to Fr.livingtuts.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (856 ms) relates to the external source Fr.livingtuts.com.
Page size can be reduced by 353.8 kB (34%)
1.0 MB
672.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Livingtuts.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 507.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.8 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livingtuts images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 250.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 250.7 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livingtuts.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (51%)
100
49
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livingtuts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
livingtuts.com
637 ms
style.css
349 ms
jquery-1.3.2.min.js
508 ms
jquery.form.js
352 ms
jquery.lavalamp.js
273 ms
jquery.easing.1.1.js
273 ms
wpfp.css
277 ms
style.css
351 ms
sidebar-login.css
351 ms
pagenavi-css.css
358 ms
widgets.js
79 ms
all.js
127 ms
jquery.js
581 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
428 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
429 ms
sidebar-login.min.js
428 ms
wpfp.js
436 ms
SyntaxHighlighter.css
568 ms
adsbygoogle.js
5 ms
shCore.js
496 ms
shBrushCSharp.js
495 ms
shBrushPhp.js
496 ms
shBrushJScript.js
561 ms
shBrushJava.js
560 ms
shBrushVb.js
562 ms
shBrushSql.js
563 ms
shBrushXml.js
564 ms
shBrushDelphi.js
621 ms
shBrushPython.js
621 ms
shBrushRuby.js
628 ms
shBrushCss.js
629 ms
shBrushCpp.js
627 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
181 ms
232 ms
ga.js
43 ms
pixel.gif
245 ms
body_bg.png
244 ms
header_bg_fr.jpg
408 ms
menu_top_bg_fr.jpg
201 ms
btn_twitter.png
244 ms
btn_rss.png
199 ms
logo.png
337 ms
search_bg.jpg
278 ms
btn_bg.jpg
279 ms
slider_big_arno22.jpg
562 ms
slider_webdesign13.jpg
429 ms
slider_big_spartan_eux.jpg
747 ms
slider_mini_spartan_eux.jpg
355 ms
slider_little_arno22.jpg
416 ms
slider_mini_webdesign13.jpg
434 ms
timthumb.php
486 ms
timthumb.php
499 ms
timthumb.php
507 ms
timthumb.php
512 ms
timthumb.php
562 ms
timthumb.php
589 ms
timthumb.php
595 ms
timthumb.php
595 ms
icon_write.png
625 ms
don_clair.png
638 ms
nav_a.gif
644 ms
icon_calendar.png
682 ms
homePost_bg.jpg
680 ms
top_homePost_bg.png
689 ms
date_bg.jpg
690 ms
bulleComment.png
714 ms
__utm.gif
118 ms
ca-pub-0311383034472153.js
168 ms
zrt_lookup.html
172 ms
show_ads_impl.js
114 ms
lt_type-webfont.ttf
670 ms
bk_thumb.png
667 ms
colLeft_bg.png
698 ms
top_sidebar_bg.jpg
709 ms
xd_arbiter.php
173 ms
xd_arbiter.php
228 ms
ping
134 ms
sidebar_bg.jpg
701 ms
h2_sidebar_bg.jpg
638 ms
puce.png
636 ms
ads
337 ms
footer_bg.jpg
671 ms
bg_large_footer.png
789 ms
osd.js
11 ms
bullet_h2_footer.png
856 ms
likebox.php
100 ms
bg_blanc_30opac.png
629 ms
btn_collapse.png
629 ms
410ucuAGgaJ.css
83 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
119 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
167 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
138 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
137 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
23 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
23 ms
2461697290109838043
94 ms
abg.js
95 ms
m_js_controller.js
107 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
32 ms
s
32 ms
x_button_blue2.png
32 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
2 ms
livingtuts.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
livingtuts.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
livingtuts.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livingtuts.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed French language. Our system also found out that Livingtuts.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livingtuts.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livingtuts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: