6.5 sec in total
799 ms
5.4 sec
274 ms
Welcome to livingwatersmakers.com homepage info - get ready to check Livingwatersmakers best content right away, or after learning these important things about livingwatersmakers.com
Elite SEO Firm is a search engine optimization company, internet marketing, and pay per click firm offering guaranteed top 10 search engine rankings.
Visit livingwatersmakers.comWe analyzed Livingwatersmakers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 799 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
livingwatersmakers.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.076
95/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
799 ms
140 ms
504 ms
517 ms
514 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Livingwatersmakers.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Archive.org and 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Livingwatersmakers.com.
Page size can be reduced by 233.5 kB (39%)
604.4 kB
370.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Livingwatersmakers.com main page is 604.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 336.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livingwatersmakers images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 221.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 221.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (31%)
32
22
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livingwatersmakers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.livingwatersmakers.com
799 ms
analytics.js
140 ms
playback.bundle_v_xTFGO54E.js
504 ms
wombat_v_UHAOicsW.js
517 ms
banner_styles_v_omkqRugM.css
514 ms
iconochive_v_qtvMKcIJ.css
510 ms
style.css
788 ms
coin_slider_styles.css
532 ms
menusm.css
812 ms
pagenavi_css.css
1041 ms
cufon_yui.js
1281 ms
cufon_titillium.js
1788 ms
jquery_1.4.2.min.js
2538 ms
menusm.js
1086 ms
script.js
1091 ms
coin_slider.min.js
1321 ms
embed
253 ms
0.gif
206 ms
main_ibg.jpg
514 ms
shadow.png
282 ms
logo.png
263 ms
menu_a.png
278 ms
slider_bg.jpg
1028 ms
watch_man.png
1753 ms
button3.gif
540 ms
button2.gif
552 ms
soc1.png
575 ms
soc2.png
798 ms
soc3.png
820 ms
line.gif
834 ms
shadow_iimg.png
850 ms
index_img1.jpg
1075 ms
index_img2.jpg
1097 ms
facebook.jpg
1361 ms
arrow.png
1124 ms
footer2_bg.gif
1300 ms
js
48 ms
livingwatersmakers.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
livingwatersmakers.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
livingwatersmakers.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livingwatersmakers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livingwatersmakers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livingwatersmakers.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livingwatersmakers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: