Tools & Wizards About Us
livingwatersmakers.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

livingwatersmakers.com

SEO Singapore | Search Engine Optimization Services

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

727 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

365 ms

livingwatersmakers.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to livingwatersmakers.com homepage info - get ready to check Livingwatersmakers best content right away, or after learning these important things about livingwatersmakers.com

Elite SEO Firm is a search engine optimization company, internet marketing, and pay per click firm offering guaranteed top 10 search engine rankings.

Visit livingwatersmakers.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Livingwatersmakers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 727 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livingwatersmakers.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.072

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.livingwatersmakers.com

727 ms

analytics.js

135 ms

playback.bundle_v_xTFGO54E.js

461 ms

wombat_v_UHAOicsW.js

454 ms

banner_styles_v_omkqRugM.css

465 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Livingwatersmakers.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Archive.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Livingwatersmakers.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.5 kB (22%)

Content Size

499.1 kB

After Optimization

388.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Livingwatersmakers.com main page is 499.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 235.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 14.7 kB
  • After minification 14.4 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 235.2 kB
  • After minification 232.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livingwatersmakers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 98.7 kB

  • Original 231.5 kB
  • After minification 231.5 kB
  • After compression 132.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.7 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 17.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (37%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livingwatersmakers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.livingwatersmakers.com

www.livingwatersmakers.com

727 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

135 ms

playback.bundle_v_xTFGO54E.js

playback.bundle_v_xTFGO54E.js

461 ms

wombat_v_UHAOicsW.js

wombat_v_UHAOicsW.js

454 ms

banner_styles_v_omkqRugM.css

banner_styles_v_omkqRugM.css

465 ms

iconochive_v_qtvMKcIJ.css

iconochive_v_qtvMKcIJ.css

475 ms

style.css

style.css

702 ms

coin_slider_styles.css

coin_slider_styles.css

472 ms

menusm.css

menusm.css

695 ms

pagenavi_css.css

pagenavi_css.css

718 ms

cufon_yui.js

cufon_yui.js

1158 ms

cufon_titillium.js

cufon_titillium.js

1161 ms

jquery_1.4.2.min.js

jquery_1.4.2.min.js

1399 ms

menusm.js

menusm.js

955 ms

script.js

script.js

965 ms

coin_slider.min.js

coin_slider.min.js

970 ms

embed

embed

227 ms

0.gif

0.gif

164 ms

main_ibg.jpg

main_ibg.jpg

249 ms

shadow.png

shadow.png

257 ms

logo.png

logo.png

282 ms

menu_a.png

menu_a.png

263 ms

slider_bg.jpg

slider_bg.jpg

475 ms

watch_man.png

watch_man.png

703 ms

button3.gif

button3.gif

511 ms

button2.gif

button2.gif

534 ms

soc1.png

soc1.png

504 ms

soc2.png

soc2.png

523 ms

soc3.png

soc3.png

740 ms

line.gif

line.gif

747 ms

shadow_iimg.png

shadow_iimg.png

797 ms

index_img1.jpg

index_img1.jpg

789 ms

index_img2.jpg

index_img2.jpg

790 ms

facebook.jpg

facebook.jpg

951 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

988 ms

footer2_bg.gif

footer2_bg.gif

1055 ms

js

js

35 ms

search.js

search.js

4 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

14 ms

Accessibility Review

livingwatersmakers.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

livingwatersmakers.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

livingwatersmakers.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livingwatersmakers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livingwatersmakers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

livingwatersmakers.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livingwatersmakers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: