3.3 sec in total
717 ms
2.5 sec
53 ms
Visit lllct.org now to see the best up-to-date Lllct content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lllct.org
Peer-to-peer breastfeeding support, information, education, and encouragement. Free monthly support meetings. La Leche League of Connecticut
Visit lllct.orgWe analyzed Lllct.org page load time and found that the first response time was 717 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
lllct.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value4.6 s
70/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
717 ms
36 ms
71 ms
1008 ms
54 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lllct.org, 38% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 35% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 689.5 kB (59%)
1.2 MB
473.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Lllct.org main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 716.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 548.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 548.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 93.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lllct needs image optimization as it can save up to 93.2 kB or 59% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (48%)
21
11
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lllct. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lllct.org
717 ms
minified.js
36 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
71 ms
polyfill.min.js
1008 ms
thunderbolt-commons.81e79c4a.bundle.min.js
54 ms
main.e8bb44c8.bundle.min.js
54 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
53 ms
lodash.min.js
55 ms
react.production.min.js
56 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
58 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
55 ms
d18711_8e69d73bb1834ea8bb94901cc032906f~mv2.png
279 ms
d18711_34eef9947779477bbaad3d812c094e78.jpg
502 ms
d18711_1f3629aca3774a6c9bf99e0ca57e4e7a.jpeg
565 ms
d18711_1921edde8b3740fd925a8704ace743d3.png
481 ms
lllctLogoLockupHorizontal-3.png
466 ms
ironpatern.84ec58ff.png
50 ms
bundle.min.js
43 ms
92 ms
94 ms
86 ms
89 ms
90 ms
88 ms
124 ms
122 ms
127 ms
125 ms
124 ms
127 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
25 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
10 ms
right-arrow.svg
8 ms
lllct.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
lllct.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lllct.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lllct.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lllct.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lllct.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lllct. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: