Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

llud.org

Home | Lost Lake Utility District

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

93 ms

Resources Loaded

843 ms

Page Rendered

527 ms

llud.org screenshot

About Website

Visit llud.org now to see the best up-to-date Llud content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about llud.org

Welcome to the Official Website of Lost Lake Utility District in Dixon, IL!

Visit llud.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Llud.org page load time and found that the first response time was 93 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

llud.org performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.102

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

llud.org

93 ms

llud.org

201 ms

css

52 ms

fontawesome.min.css

53 ms

all.min.css

151 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Llud.org, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (201 ms) belongs to the original domain Llud.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 75.8 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Llud.org main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 27.7 kB

  • Original 35.6 kB
  • After minification 29.0 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.6 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Llud images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 337.6 kB
  • After minification 337.6 kB
  • After compression 335.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 606 B

  • Original 180.6 kB
  • After minification 180.6 kB
  • After compression 179.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Llud.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (37%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Llud. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

llud.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

llud.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

llud.org SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Llud.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Llud.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Llud. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: