3.6 sec in total
199 ms
3.1 sec
285 ms
Welcome to loadscan.com homepage info - get ready to check Loadscan best content for New Zealand right away, or after learning these important things about loadscan.com
The only payload scanning systems with official trade certification. Accurate to +/-1%. Trusted by industry.
Visit loadscan.comWe analyzed Loadscan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
loadscan.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.0 s
0/100
10%
Value28.8 s
0/100
25%
Value17.9 s
0/100
10%
Value2,330 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value28.7 s
0/100
10%
199 ms
740 ms
859 ms
67 ms
181 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Loadscan.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Loadscan.com.
Page size can be reduced by 670.3 kB (36%)
1.9 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Loadscan.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Loadscan images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 330.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 330.9 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 252.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loadscan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 252.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (39%)
59
36
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Loadscan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
loadscan.com
199 ms
loadscan.com
740 ms
www.loadscan.com
859 ms
css
67 ms
autoptimize_abb4b2daed711b088f167017d441bd66.css
181 ms
css
97 ms
css
112 ms
css
112 ms
css
112 ms
jquery-ui.css
88 ms
api.js
42 ms
autoptimize_58ddbeddf697006c1f91f9b8b8fbcd95.js
373 ms
analytics.js
61 ms
LoadScan-Logo.png
417 ms
MyScanner-Logo.png
499 ms
youtube.png
408 ms
google-plus.png
408 ms
pinterest.png
411 ms
linkedin.png
411 ms
twitter.png
416 ms
facebook.png
414 ms
background-slide-1.jpg
908 ms
blue-truck-with-load-3.png
537 ms
scanner-triangle-fade-bigger.png
508 ms
scanner.png
608 ms
drive-through-measurement.png
509 ms
background-slide-2.jpg
705 ms
scanner-ray-x.png
597 ms
increase-productivity.png
603 ms
background-slide-3.jpg
711 ms
slide-3-scanner.png
686 ms
slide-3-scanner-beam.png
696 ms
load-report.png
702 ms
laptop-extra.png
776 ms
orange-truck-with-load.png
980 ms
background-slide-4.jpg
1091 ms
scanner-ray-2.png
781 ms
scanner-ray-11.png
793 ms
new-dimension-message.png
865 ms
mining-200x200.jpg
858 ms
construction3-200x200.jpg
879 ms
mulch-200x200.jpg
936 ms
quarry-200x200.jpg
1044 ms
LOADSCAN-SYMBOL.png
961 ms
DSC00828-75x55.jpg
1001 ms
blue-truck-with-load-3-75x55.png
1012 ms
Full-Size-Mulch-3-75x55.jpg
1044 ms
collect
42 ms
recaptcha__en.js
102 ms
s3s-truckrig-75x55.jpg
959 ms
JEgmtEDzc-IH8jBshQXrYA.woff
116 ms
haOjnueK8Or1ztuuRtr8dvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
133 ms
LKf8nhXsWg5ybwEGXk8UBQ.woff
150 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
149 ms
collect
88 ms
m_J3nYLkIiGqm2wAiy01kg.woff
79 ms
gdFHbjHcLYROorto_Tq2Ez8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
77 ms
PIPMHY90P7jtyjpXuZ2cLD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
77 ms
lILlYDvubYemzYzN7GbLkHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
97 ms
ga-audiences
27 ms
gtm.js
129 ms
skin.css
802 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
694 ms
mulch-200x200-75x55.jpg
796 ms
page26_0_11-75x55.png
794 ms
load4-75x55.jpg
793 ms
mining2-200x200-75x55.jpg
792 ms
LoadScan-Mobile-System-3-670x350-75x55.jpg
791 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
13 ms
conversion_async.js
35 ms
ga-audiences
16 ms
30 ms
16 ms
loadscan.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
loadscan.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
loadscan.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loadscan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loadscan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
loadscan.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Loadscan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: