Tools & Wizards About Us
loadtest.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

loadtest.us

ZebraTester For Application Testing & Synthetic Monitoring | Apica

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

26 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

481 ms

loadtest.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Loadtest content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about loadtest.us

Apica ZebraTester™ is an enterprise-grade load and stress-testing product that meets your business goals and needs for advanced scripts.

Visit loadtest.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Loadtest.us page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

loadtest.us performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

loadtest.us

26 ms

www.loadtest.us

13 ms

www.zebratester.com

686 ms

css

28 ms

animations.css

216 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Loadtest.us, 68% (70 requests) were made to Zebratester.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Forms.hubspot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Zebratester.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (74%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

776.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Loadtest.us main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 263.1 kB

  • Original 294.7 kB
  • After minification 286.5 kB
  • After compression 31.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 263.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 166.2 kB

  • Original 329.0 kB
  • After minification 162.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Loadtest needs image optimization as it can save up to 166.2 kB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 497.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 504.9 kB

  • Original 590.0 kB
  • After minification 528.4 kB
  • After compression 85.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loadtest.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 504.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (74%)

Requests Now

91

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Loadtest. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

loadtest.us

loadtest.us

26 ms

www.loadtest.us

www.loadtest.us

13 ms

www.zebratester.com

www.zebratester.com

686 ms

css

css

28 ms

animations.css

animations.css

216 ms

apica-style.css

apica-style.css

338 ms

zebras.css

zebras.css

234 ms

font-icons.css

font-icons.css

237 ms

v2.js

v2.js

106 ms

current.js

current.js

185 ms

apica.js

apica.js

1311 ms

css3-animate-it.js

css3-animate-it.js

428 ms

jQuery.equalHeights.js

jQuery.equalHeights.js

322 ms

typed.min.js

typed.min.js

429 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

606 ms

jquery.fancybox-media.js

jquery.fancybox-media.js

602 ms

apica_api2.js

apica_api2.js

605 ms

shCore.js

shCore.js

850 ms

shBrushAS3.js

shBrushAS3.js

755 ms

shBrushBash.js

shBrushBash.js

755 ms

shBrushColdFusion.js

shBrushColdFusion.js

754 ms

shBrushClojure.js

shBrushClojure.js

760 ms

shBrushCpp.js

shBrushCpp.js

753 ms

shBrushCSharp.js

shBrushCSharp.js

853 ms

shBrushCss.js

shBrushCss.js

854 ms

shBrushDelphi.js

shBrushDelphi.js

852 ms

shBrushDiff.js

shBrushDiff.js

852 ms

shBrushErlang.js

shBrushErlang.js

851 ms

shBrushFSharp.js

shBrushFSharp.js

928 ms

shBrushGroovy.js

shBrushGroovy.js

966 ms

shBrushJava.js

shBrushJava.js

967 ms

shBrushJavaFX.js

shBrushJavaFX.js

962 ms

shBrushJScript.js

shBrushJScript.js

964 ms

shBrushLatex.js

shBrushLatex.js

965 ms

shBrushMatlabKey.js

shBrushMatlabKey.js

1037 ms

shBrushObjC.js

shBrushObjC.js

1081 ms

shBrushPerl.js

shBrushPerl.js

1090 ms

shBrushPhp.js

shBrushPhp.js

1089 ms

shBrushPlain.js

shBrushPlain.js

1089 ms

shBrushPowerShell.js

shBrushPowerShell.js

1090 ms

shBrushPython.js

shBrushPython.js

1146 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

71 ms

shBrushR.js

shBrushR.js

1132 ms

shBrushRuby.js

shBrushRuby.js

1019 ms

shBrushScala.js

shBrushScala.js

1002 ms

shBrushSql.js

shBrushSql.js

997 ms

shBrushVb.js

shBrushVb.js

911 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

64 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

360 ms

i.js

i.js

212 ms

f7d29158d41c8569b09b77bf42736332e1a0dd7e.1.js

f7d29158d41c8569b09b77bf42736332e1a0dd7e.1.js

236 ms

Cnb96XtWYwg

Cnb96XtWYwg

332 ms

shBrushXml.js

shBrushXml.js

848 ms

zba_logo2.png

zba_logo2.png

177 ms

activision.png

activision.png

226 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

e33c411a-6566-43ab-ad21-4430e2e91484

e33c411a-6566-43ab-ad21-4430e2e91484

56 ms

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

657 ms

OpenSans-Light.ttf

OpenSans-Light.ttf

574 ms

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

702 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

248 ms

collect

collect

149 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

329 ms

134 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

35 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

57 ms

nba_small.png

nba_small.png

214 ms

weightwatchers.png

weightwatchers.png

345 ms

virginamerica.png

virginamerica.png

409 ms

Tumblr.png

Tumblr.png

470 ms

equifax_small.png

equifax_small.png

542 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

50 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

52 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

40 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

44 ms

scholastic.png

scholastic.png

456 ms

ediblearrangements.png

ediblearrangements.png

537 ms

RMS.png

RMS.png

537 ms

exacttarget.png

exacttarget.png

538 ms

informatica_small.png

informatica_small.png

592 ms

rovi.png

rovi.png

592 ms

Zebratester-500px.png

Zebratester-500px.png

585 ms

network.png

network.png

517 ms

chevron-left.png

chevron-left.png

514 ms

chevron-right.png

chevron-right.png

532 ms

phone.png

phone.png

705 ms

email.png

email.png

705 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

704 ms

dev-blog.png

dev-blog.png

718 ms

ga.js

ga.js

20 ms

shCore.css

shCore.css

120 ms

shThemeDefault.css

shThemeDefault.css

117 ms

e

e

51 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

50 ms

s

s

4 ms

488396.js

488396.js

182 ms

185 ms

all

all

1070 ms

c30df994-38ea-4b8e-b744-eab4f06e2c64

c30df994-38ea-4b8e-b744-eab4f06e2c64

172 ms

4ed1849f-e726-49e9-8139-09d47ee39bb4

4ed1849f-e726-49e9-8139-09d47ee39bb4

195 ms

85b41ba6-08e7-46a1-91a2-7c9cb8dfda24

85b41ba6-08e7-46a1-91a2-7c9cb8dfda24

172 ms

dad20c16-6c56-4af6-a2c2-b2e163c518ec

dad20c16-6c56-4af6-a2c2-b2e163c518ec

160 ms

62 ms

Accessibility Review

loadtest.us accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

loadtest.us best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

loadtest.us SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loadtest.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loadtest.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

loadtest.us

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Loadtest. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: