Tools & Wizards About Us
loadtesting.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

loadtesting.co

What is Load Testing? | Best Practices in 2024

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

loadtesting.co screenshot

About Website

Visit loadtesting.co now to see the best up-to-date Load Testing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about loadtesting.co

What is load testing and why is it important? This guide explains the benefits and best practices for load testing websites, apps, and APIs in 2024 .

Visit loadtesting.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Loadtesting.co page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

loadtesting.co performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

loadtesting.co

59 ms

350 ms

lazyload.min.js

28 ms

inlinks.js

115 ms

LoadView-logo.svg

353 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Loadtesting.co, 49% (33 requests) were made to Loadview-testing.com and 32% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (598 ms) relates to the external source Loadview-testing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 428.6 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

884.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Loadtesting.co main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 633.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 386.5 kB

  • Original 464.1 kB
  • After minification 457.0 kB
  • After compression 77.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 386.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 39.6 kB

  • Original 633.0 kB
  • After minification 593.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Load Testing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 157.5 kB
  • After minification 157.5 kB
  • After compression 155.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 58.7 kB
  • After minification 58.7 kB
  • After compression 58.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loadtesting.co has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (32%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Load Testing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

loadtesting.co

loadtesting.co

59 ms

350 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

28 ms

inlinks.js

inlinks.js

115 ms

LoadView-logo.svg

LoadView-logo.svg

353 ms

LoadView-logo-alt.svg

LoadView-logo-alt.svg

426 ms

data-graph.png

data-graph.png

429 ms

60-lines.png

60-lines.png

428 ms

global-network.png

global-network.png

429 ms

load-stress-performance-testing-300x288.png

load-stress-performance-testing-300x288.png

104 ms

computer-technology.png

computer-technology.png

351 ms

growth-chart.png

growth-chart.png

430 ms

load-test-scripting-300x228.png

load-test-scripting-300x228.png

429 ms

loadview-shift-left.png

loadview-shift-left.png

430 ms

stress-testing-and-load-testing-300x169.png

stress-testing-and-load-testing-300x169.png

431 ms

DevOps-load-testing-300x200.png

DevOps-load-testing-300x200.png

432 ms

cloud.png

cloud.png

431 ms

website-load-test-software-300x228.png

website-load-test-software-300x228.png

432 ms

performance-testing-load-testing-life-cycle-300x251.jpg

performance-testing-load-testing-life-cycle-300x251.jpg

432 ms

geo-distributed-load-testing-300x164.png

geo-distributed-load-testing-300x164.png

433 ms

performance-testing-website-300x237.jpg

performance-testing-website-300x237.jpg

434 ms

load-performance-testing-300x228.png

load-performance-testing-300x228.png

436 ms

test-page-applications-300x188.jpg

test-page-applications-300x188.jpg

560 ms

us.png

us.png

434 ms

es.png

es.png

434 ms

de.png

de.png

560 ms

zh.png

zh.png

435 ms

ru.png

ru.png

560 ms

fr.png

fr.png

560 ms

pt-br.png

pt-br.png

560 ms

ja.png

ja.png

559 ms

ar.png

ar.png

598 ms

LoadTestingTools_Leader_Leader.png

LoadTestingTools_Leader_Leader.png

596 ms

LoadTestingTools_HighPerformer_Americas_HighPerformer.png

LoadTestingTools_HighPerformer_Americas_HighPerformer.png

597 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff

28 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

40 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff

52 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

51 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff

51 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

52 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff

52 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

49 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff

52 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

68 ms

N4Js1C6bTkA

N4Js1C6bTkA

106 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

7 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

25 ms

base.js

base.js

53 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

217 ms

jz7nBWcXoC6PzFPxSGBK-EbGk4-kUqTnoXZXIXcr3eQ.js

jz7nBWcXoC6PzFPxSGBK-EbGk4-kUqTnoXZXIXcr3eQ.js

164 ms

embed.js

embed.js

24 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXZ0oA.woff

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXZ0oA.woff

17 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXZ0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXZ0ow.ttf

50 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXZ0oA.woff

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXZ0oA.woff

50 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXZ0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXZ0ow.ttf

48 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

245 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

342 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

108 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

48 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

49 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

49 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

105 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

105 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

104 ms

id

id

90 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

88 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

88 ms

Create

Create

135 ms

Accessibility Review

loadtesting.co accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

loadtesting.co best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

loadtesting.co SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loadtesting.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loadtesting.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

loadtesting.co

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Load Testing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: