Tools & Wizards About Us
loadtesting.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

loadtesting.co

What is Load Testing? | Best Practices in 2024

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

55 ms

Resources Loaded

739 ms

Page Rendered

609 ms

loadtesting.co screenshot

About Website

Visit loadtesting.co now to see the best up-to-date Load Testing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about loadtesting.co

What is load testing and why is it important? This guide explains the benefits and best practices for load testing websites, apps, and APIs in 2024 .

Visit loadtesting.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Loadtesting.co page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

loadtesting.co performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

loadtesting.co

55 ms

244 ms

133 ms

lbq0u3hp6h

64 ms

LoadView-logo.svg

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Loadtesting.co, 42% (18 requests) were made to Loadview-testing.com and 42% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (244 ms) relates to the external source Loadview-testing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 366.6 kB (80%)

Content Size

460.4 kB

After Optimization

93.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Loadtesting.co main page is 460.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 432.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 366.0 kB

  • Original 432.7 kB
  • After minification 426.8 kB
  • After compression 66.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 366.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 323 B

  • Original 27.0 kB
  • After minification 26.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Load Testing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 224 B

  • Original 637 B
  • After minification 637 B
  • After compression 413 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 224 B or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (47%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Load Testing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

loadtesting.co

loadtesting.co

55 ms

244 ms

133 ms

lbq0u3hp6h

lbq0u3hp6h

64 ms

LoadView-logo.svg

LoadView-logo.svg

69 ms

LoadView-logo-alt.svg

LoadView-logo-alt.svg

76 ms

60-lines.png

60-lines.png

75 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff

25 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

33 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff

42 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

54 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff

43 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

52 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff

42 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

41 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff

53 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

53 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

50 ms

inlinks.js

inlinks.js

67 ms

us.png

us.png

62 ms

es.png

es.png

93 ms

de.png

de.png

97 ms

zh.png

zh.png

94 ms

ru.png

ru.png

95 ms

fr.png

fr.png

155 ms

pt-br.png

pt-br.png

114 ms

ja.png

ja.png

146 ms

ar.png

ar.png

125 ms

g2-LoadView-smmer2024-LoadTestingTools_Leader.png

g2-LoadView-smmer2024-LoadTestingTools_Leader.png

127 ms

g2-LoadView-smmer2024-LoadTestingTools_EasiestToUse_EaseOfUse.png

g2-LoadView-smmer2024-LoadTestingTools_EasiestToUse_EaseOfUse.png

134 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

27 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

47 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

69 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXZ0oA.woff

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXZ0oA.woff

10 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXZ0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXZ0ow.ttf

9 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

47 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

8 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

8 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

8 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

16 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

16 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

41 ms

c.gif

c.gif

15 ms

Accessibility Review

loadtesting.co accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

loadtesting.co best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

loadtesting.co SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loadtesting.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loadtesting.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

loadtesting.co

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Load Testing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: