Tools & Wizards About Us
loadtestingtool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 62

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

loadtestingtool.com

WAPT Pro - Test the Performance of Your Website Under Load

Page Load Speed

900 ms in total

First Response

117 ms

Resources Loaded

510 ms

Page Rendered

273 ms

loadtestingtool.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Load Test Ingtool content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about loadtestingtool.com

With a single tool you can test all types of websites, mobile applications, corporate ERP and CRM systems, web API services and even Internet of Things platforms.

Visit loadtestingtool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Loadtestingtool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 783 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

loadtestingtool.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

loadtestingtool.com

117 ms

www.loadtestingtool.com

95 ms

style.css

22 ms

css

42 ms

css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Loadtestingtool.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (170 ms) belongs to the original domain Loadtestingtool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 212.8 kB (34%)

Content Size

625.2 kB

After Optimization

412.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Loadtestingtool.com main page is 625.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 314.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

  • Original 32.7 kB
  • After minification 27.5 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 314.4 kB
  • After minification 308.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Load Test Ingtool images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 156.0 kB

  • Original 244.8 kB
  • After minification 244.4 kB
  • After compression 88.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 156.0 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 26.0 kB

  • Original 33.3 kB
  • After minification 30.2 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loadtestingtool.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (45%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

34

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Load Test Ingtool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

loadtestingtool.com

loadtestingtool.com

117 ms

www.loadtestingtool.com

www.loadtestingtool.com

95 ms

style.css

style.css

22 ms

css

css

42 ms

css

css

54 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

20 ms

jquery.megamenu.js

jquery.megamenu.js

24 ms

videolightbox.css

videolightbox.css

24 ms

overlay-minimal.css

overlay-minimal.css

25 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

40 ms

videolightbox.js

videolightbox.js

88 ms

contactable.css

contactable.css

95 ms

jquery.contactable.js

jquery.contactable.js

31 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

83 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

75 ms

b_top_line.jpg

b_top_line.jpg

75 ms

line.png

line.png

76 ms

logo.png

logo.png

85 ms

icon_wapt.png

icon_wapt.png

79 ms

icon_wapt_pro.png

icon_wapt_pro.png

81 ms

icon_wapt_cloud.png

icon_wapt_cloud.png

79 ms

icon_engine.png

icon_engine.png

79 ms

icon_asp.png

icon_asp.png

76 ms

icon_json.png

icon_json.png

82 ms

icon_flash.png

icon_flash.png

86 ms

icon_silverlight.png

icon_silverlight.png

84 ms

icon_gwt.png

icon_gwt.png

92 ms

icon_binary.png

icon_binary.png

82 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

88 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

84 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

90 ms

gplus.png

gplus.png

89 ms

bg_header_line.jpg

bg_header_line.jpg

118 ms

bg_header.jpg

bg_header.jpg

125 ms

bullet_header.png

bullet_header.png

118 ms

btn_download.png

btn_download.png

117 ms

header_img.png

header_img.png

166 ms

bg_content.jpg

bg_content.jpg

116 ms

content_sh_top.png

content_sh_top.png

123 ms

content_sh_bot.png

content_sh_bot.png

123 ms

bg_question.png

bg_question.png

123 ms

buttons.png

buttons.png

122 ms

waptvideothumb.png

waptvideothumb.png

151 ms

icon_pdf.png

icon_pdf.png

139 ms

icon_ppt.png

icon_ppt.png

136 ms

windows7compatible.png

windows7compatible.png

165 ms

certifiedwindowsvista.gif

certifiedwindowsvista.gif

149 ms

designed4winxp.gif

designed4winxp.gif

148 ms

ourclients.png

ourclients.png

170 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

78 ms

froogaloop2.min.js

froogaloop2.min.js

106 ms

bg_testimonials.gif

bg_testimonials.gif

106 ms

bubble.png

bubble.png

114 ms

7YGmE4Ls5b94ct65u07hVQLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff

7YGmE4Ls5b94ct65u07hVQLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff

61 ms

0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNL3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNL3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

74 ms

Ewe0SEXPrakEimFzbOGwB6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.woff

Ewe0SEXPrakEimFzbOGwB6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.woff

88 ms

A4RWZsncmJ25G8iqn2EHN3YhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.woff

A4RWZsncmJ25G8iqn2EHN3YhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.woff

89 ms

x-7NZTw0n-ypOAaIE8uSrnYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.woff

x-7NZTw0n-ypOAaIE8uSrnYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.woff

90 ms

59 ms

q_open.png

q_open.png

99 ms

q_close.png

q_close.png

100 ms

dash_white.gif

dash_white.gif

113 ms

bg_footer.jpg

bg_footer.jpg

100 ms

contact.png

contact.png

101 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

122 ms

white.png

white.png

122 ms

collect

collect

20 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

35 ms

print.css

print.css

14 ms

Accessibility Review

loadtestingtool.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

loadtestingtool.com best practices score

62

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Uses deprecated APIs

SEO Factors

loadtestingtool.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loadtestingtool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Loadtestingtool.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

loadtestingtool.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Load Test Ingtool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: