1.7 sec in total
87 ms
1.3 sec
331 ms
Welcome to lobstergram.com homepage info - get ready to check Lobster Gram best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lobstergram.com
Commerce Cloud Storefront Reference Architecture
Visit lobstergram.comWe analyzed Lobstergram.com page load time and found that the first response time was 87 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
lobstergram.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value30.1 s
0/100
25%
Value53.1 s
0/100
10%
Value31,110 ms
0/100
30%
Value1.588
0/100
15%
Value52.8 s
0/100
10%
87 ms
106 ms
17 ms
70 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Lobstergram.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 10% (9 requests) were made to D.adroll.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (495 ms) relates to the external source Www2.mousestats.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (51%)
2.0 MB
952.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Lobstergram.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.5 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lobster Gram images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 679.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 679.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 227.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lobstergram.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 227.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (79%)
70
15
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lobster Gram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lobstergram.com
87 ms
www.lobstergram.com
106 ms
91cf2758b330f7532447e869fc9b1872.css
17 ms
prototype.js
70 ms
scriptaculous.js
96 ms
jquery.min.js
101 ms
2217120183.js
114 ms
ccard.js
44 ms
validation.js
13 ms
builder.js
46 ms
effects.js
51 ms
dragdrop.js
42 ms
controls.js
50 ms
slider.js
50 ms
js.js
50 ms
form.js
49 ms
menu.js
49 ms
translate.js
50 ms
cookies.js
51 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
61 ms
scripts.js
50 ms
catalogevent.js
57 ms
wishlist.js
50 ms
hoverintent.js
56 ms
responsivenav.js
56 ms
flexslider.min.js
59 ms
gri.ajaxcart.js
58 ms
lobstergram.js
86 ms
event.tracking.js
86 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
85 ms
conversion.js
53 ms
builder.js
12 ms
effects.js
13 ms
dragdrop.js
20 ms
controls.js
23 ms
slider.js
24 ms
sound.js
25 ms
event
50 ms
rokkitt-regular-webfont.woff
17 ms
rokkitt-webfont.woff
20 ms
goal.min.js
60 ms
ga.js
58 ms
board-texture.jpg
10 ms
national-surf-and-turf-homepage.jpg
59 ms
lobster101-homepage.jpg
26 ms
hp-banner2.jpg
56 ms
Lent-Subbanner-Home.jpg
53 ms
hp-banner4-no-button.jpg
55 ms
Inventory-Markdowns-Homepage.jpg
56 ms
js
125 ms
gtm.js
101 ms
sprite.png
54 ms
rope_light.png
33 ms
scalloped-edge.png
20 ms
list-bullet.png
20 ms
scalloped-edge-btm.png
21 ms
mail-icon.gif
21 ms
__utm.gif
78 ms
72 ms
b.min.js
111 ms
bta.js
13 ms
bat.js
54 ms
hotjar-156241.js
100 ms
gtmp_compiled_FD-w6i_oWUw.js
49 ms
collect
89 ms
63 ms
jquery.min.js
20 ms
modules-41154dcc2471ae5ffaca14bb84e00edb.js
44 ms
config.js
74 ms
ga-audiences
38 ms
4961418329730218745.js
495 ms
roundtrip.js
39 ms
MHYIB5AVBVEHTMBAEPVQ3V.js
205 ms
visit-data
238 ms
out
10 ms
tr
123 ms
22 ms
out
5 ms
out
7 ms
out
7 ms
out
10 ms
out
11 ms
out
11 ms
out
12 ms
u.php
82 ms
adsct
128 ms
pixel
90 ms
66 ms
sd
37 ms
377928.gif
33 ms
Pug
36 ms
in
6 ms
lobstergram.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
lobstergram.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lobstergram.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lobstergram.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lobstergram.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lobster Gram. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: