2.5 sec in total
182 ms
2.2 sec
149 ms
Click here to check amazing Local Churches FAQ content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about localchurchesfaq.org
Visit localchurchesfaq.orgWe analyzed Localchurchesfaq.org page load time and found that the first response time was 182 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
localchurchesfaq.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value5.2 s
24/100
25%
Value6.8 s
34/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
182 ms
1441 ms
70 ms
129 ms
173 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Localchurchesfaq.org, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Localchurchesfaq.org.
Page size can be reduced by 62.1 kB (27%)
226.8 kB
164.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Localchurchesfaq.org main page is 226.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 98.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Local Churches FAQ needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Localchurchesfaq.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (64%)
25
9
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Local Churches FAQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
localchurchesfaq.org
182 ms
localchurchesfaq.org
1441 ms
style.min.css
70 ms
style.css
129 ms
RcVCite.css
173 ms
RcVCite-extra-themes.css
172 ms
fontfaces.css
173 ms
css
28 ms
style.css
174 ms
style-mobile.css
174 ms
style.css
189 ms
style.css
228 ms
wp-sentry-browser.min.js
294 ms
versification.js
231 ms
jquery.min.js
294 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
232 ms
RcVCite_v00_04.js
248 ms
frontend.js
284 ms
analytics.js
65 ms
back.png
91 ms
Twitter.png
89 ms
Facebook.png
91 ms
GooglePlus.png
90 ms
logo.png
211 ms
search.png
91 ms
TK3gWksYAxQ7jbsKcg8Ene8.ttf
194 ms
elusive.woff
125 ms
collect
13 ms
js
66 ms
localchurchesfaq.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
localchurchesfaq.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
localchurchesfaq.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Localchurchesfaq.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Localchurchesfaq.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
localchurchesfaq.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Local Churches FAQ. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: