21.9 sec in total
346 ms
21.1 sec
420 ms
Welcome to logiga.com homepage info - get ready to check Logiga best content right away, or after learning these important things about logiga.com
Visit logiga.comWe analyzed Logiga.com page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 21.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 3 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
logiga.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value4.9 s
66/100
10%
Value340 ms
74/100
30%
Value0.163
72/100
15%
Value5.2 s
74/100
10%
346 ms
185 ms
255 ms
459 ms
258 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Logiga.com, 26% (17 requests) were made to Aom789.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to 0. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source .
Page size can be reduced by 138.6 kB (5%)
2.7 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Logiga.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 244 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 244 B or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Logiga images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 84.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 84.8 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Logiga.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 45% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (15%)
61
52
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Logiga. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.logiga.com
346 ms
common.js
185 ms
gzg_style.css
255 ms
jquery.min.js.js
459 ms
superslide.js
258 ms
sy_news_qh.js
129 ms
inetdetect.js
254 ms
tj.js
133 ms
if789.php
664 ms
xcc_small_ssl.png
1007 ms
gzg_logo.jpg
123 ms
gzg_more_ico.jpg
72 ms
gzg_fzgh_pic01.jpg
194 ms
gzg_fzgh_pic02.jpg
196 ms
gzg_fzgh_pic03.jpg
196 ms
W020230627047441134051_220.jpg
281 ms
W020230627046880077376_220.jpg
246 ms
W020230627045479254476_220.jpg
338 ms
W020230621032135716953_220.jpg
338 ms
W020230621030157224640_220.jpg
337 ms
gzg_qyry_pic01.jpg
429 ms
gzg_qyry_pic03.jpg
398 ms
logo_down.jpg
399 ms
gzg_html_bg.jpg
332 ms
8.129.64.226
20066 ms
[2408:4003:1105:c900:53f3:acf8:4c7a:5e6]
1 ms
gzg_banner_pic06.jpg
431 ms
gzg_banner_pic04.jpg
473 ms
gzg_banner_pic02.jpg
554 ms
gzg_banner_pic03.jpg
619 ms
gzg_banner_pic05.jpg
494 ms
gzg_wrap_bg.jpg
188 ms
gzg_ywlb_bg.jpg
250 ms
gzg_content_bg02.jpg
312 ms
gzg_content_bg.png
375 ms
gzg_jtjj_con_bg.jpg
538 ms
gzg_line.jpg
482 ms
gzg_jtjj_li_bg.jpg
525 ms
gzg_jtjj_li_span.jpg
546 ms
gzg_li_ico.jpg
536 ms
gzg_fwtd_li_bg01.jpg
567 ms
ta.js
1802 ms
push.js
730 ms
[2408:4003:1105:c900:53f3:acf8:4c7a:5e6]
20019 ms
aom789.com
393 ms
jquery.cdn.js
19690 ms
index.css
77 ms
z.js
1524 ms
o3.png
1208 ms
h1.png
226 ms
h2.png
230 ms
lasi.gif
688 ms
active-star-rating.86f7f0e1.svg
230 ms
bet888.gif
694 ms
yunding.gif
1200 ms
yh42.gif
458 ms
vns888.gif
776 ms
img1.png
533 ms
img2.png
609 ms
img3.png
685 ms
h3.png
760 ms
h4.png
768 ms
FIFAWC_1920x1080.jpg
1218 ms
1.gif
250 ms
stat.htm
1415 ms
c.js
872 ms
logiga.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
logiga.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
logiga.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Logiga.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Logiga.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
logiga.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Logiga. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: