6.6 sec in total
647 ms
5.7 sec
250 ms
Visit logineye.in now to see the best up-to-date Logineye content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about logineye.in
Login Eye is a pioneer supplying company of Security Control Systems, Access Control System, Video Door Phones, deals in Security Control Systems, Wholesale Access Control System suppliers in West Ben...
Visit logineye.inWe analyzed Logineye.in page load time and found that the first response time was 647 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
logineye.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value4,120 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.179
68/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
647 ms
891 ms
246 ms
955 ms
299 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Logineye.in, 69% (47 requests) were made to Catalog.wlimg.com and 10% (7 requests) were made to 2.wlimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Catalog.wlimg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 61.6 kB (4%)
1.5 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Logineye.in main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Logineye images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Logineye.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (59%)
59
24
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Logineye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
logineye.in
647 ms
www.logineye.in
891 ms
catalog_common.css
246 ms
catalog.css
955 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
299 ms
bizcatglog-js.js
261 ms
country_list.js
261 ms
common-static-form_new.js
263 ms
swfobject-new.js
264 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
287 ms
resp_common.js
282 ms
Modernizr2.7.1.js
241 ms
jquery.DG_Slider.min.js
237 ms
jquery.zoom-min.js
230 ms
lt.ie8.js
247 ms
12420.js
247 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
247 ms
jquery.meanmenu.min.js
254 ms
fluid_dg.min.js
247 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
251 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
250 ms
jquery.photo.gallery.js
250 ms
jquery.paging.photo.gallery.js
252 ms
index.php
546 ms
element.js
245 ms
index.php
423 ms
css2
87 ms
font-awesome.min.css
82 ms
bg_body.png
1471 ms
whatsapp.png
77 ms
close-icon.png
89 ms
12526-comp-image.png
364 ms
1001-32x32.png
90 ms
pl-24x16.png
101 ms
ca-24x16.png
462 ms
sr-24x16.png
476 ms
et-24x16.png
93 ms
cctv-cable-with-connector-913483.jpg
771 ms
search_button.png
510 ms
spacer.png
474 ms
rss_icon.png
360 ms
cctv-camera-1550033690-913485.jpeg
584 ms
video-door-phones-1550033845-913498.jpeg
853 ms
spy-cameras-1346251.jpg
788 ms
surveillance-hdd-1346253.jpg
845 ms
fisheye-camera-1346254.jpg
802 ms
epabx-system-1346258.jpg
803 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
258 ms
qcIcon.png
952 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUE.ttf
314 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9ogUE.ttf
347 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvgUE.ttf
379 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vgUE.ttf
380 ms
4UaHrEJGsxNmFTPDnkaJx60.ttf
354 ms
icomoon.ttf
254 ms
black_format2_1.gif
220 ms
black_format2_6.gif
220 ms
black_format2_3.gif
217 ms
black_format2_5.gif
219 ms
black_format2_0.gif
399 ms
sprites_image.png
898 ms
controls.png
382 ms
meanmenu.min.css
231 ms
responsive.css
251 ms
mobile.css
219 ms
fluid_dg_skins.png
249 ms
fluid_dg-loader.gif
219 ms
87464.jpg
950 ms
logineye.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
logineye.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
logineye.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Logineye.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Logineye.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
logineye.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Logineye. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: