3.3 sec in total
200 ms
3 sec
155 ms
Click here to check amazing London Trading Standards content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about londontradingstandards.org.uk
Visit londontradingstandards.org.ukWe analyzed Londontradingstandards.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
londontradingstandards.org.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value9.9 s
10/100
10%
Value1,480 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
200 ms
856 ms
905 ms
155 ms
233 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Londontradingstandards.org.uk, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (905 ms) belongs to the original domain Londontradingstandards.org.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 102.9 kB (18%)
558.3 kB
455.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Londontradingstandards.org.uk main page is 558.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 373.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization.
Potential reduce by 15.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Londontradingstandards.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 30% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (78%)
50
11
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of London Trading Standards. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
londontradingstandards.org.uk
200 ms
londontradingstandards.org.uk
856 ms
www.londontradingstandards.org.uk
905 ms
styles.css
155 ms
styles.css
233 ms
css
32 ms
css
45 ms
css
47 ms
bootstrap.min.css
323 ms
font-awesome.min.css
242 ms
style.css
246 ms
style.css
247 ms
addtoany.min.css
251 ms
style.css
326 ms
masonry.css
333 ms
page.js
28 ms
jquery.min.js
409 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
335 ms
addtoany.min.js
336 ms
email-posts-to-subscribers.js
402 ms
js
66 ms
style.css
333 ms
index.js
389 ms
index.js
389 ms
bootstrap.min.js
446 ms
scrollReveal.min.js
451 ms
parallax.js
452 ms
zerif.js
531 ms
skiplink-fix.js
531 ms
script.min.js
542 ms
api.js
51 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
542 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
541 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
541 ms
index.js
629 ms
init-masonry.js
628 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
627 ms
masonry.min.js
627 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
632 ms
scripts.js
628 ms
eso.Ep5bSEmr.js
12 ms
loading.gif
317 ms
LTS-logo-1.gif
399 ms
home-banner-v2.gif
642 ms
twitter-round-icon-1.png
320 ms
facebook-round-icon-1.png
323 ms
instagram-round-icon-1.png
324 ms
tiktok-round-icon-1.png
395 ms
ajax-loader.gif
401 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
62 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
141 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
168 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
166 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
167 ms
widget.js
186 ms
recaptcha__en.js
38 ms
sm.25.html
27 ms
widget_app_base_1707998198539.js
26 ms
londontradingstandards.org.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
londontradingstandards.org.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
londontradingstandards.org.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Londontradingstandards.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Londontradingstandards.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
londontradingstandards.org.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of London Trading Standards. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: