Tools & Wizards About Us
lone-star.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

lone-star.net

Lone Star Technologies: Austin Web Design and Ruby on Rails Software Development

Page Load Speed

820 ms in total

First Response

99 ms

Resources Loaded

534 ms

Page Rendered

187 ms

lone-star.net screenshot

About Website

Visit lone-star.net now to see the best up-to-date Lone Star content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lone-star.net

An Austin web design firm providing ruby on rails software development, mobile friendly responsive design, graphic design, premium bandwidth web hosting, e-commerce development, and custom software de...

Visit lone-star.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lone-star.net page load time and found that the first response time was 99 ms and then it took 721 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lone-star.net performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lone-star.net

99 ms

screen.css

32 ms

typography.css

58 ms

lsi_dropdown.js

90 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

112 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Lone-star.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (147 ms) belongs to the original domain Lone-star.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.5 kB (3%)

Content Size

566.9 kB

After Optimization

548.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lone-star.net main page is 566.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 450.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 13.0 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.6 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 450.0 kB
  • After minification 443.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lone Star images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 96.0 kB
  • After minification 96.0 kB
  • After compression 94.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 8.0 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lone-star.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (21%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lone Star. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lone-star.net

lone-star.net

99 ms

screen.css

screen.css

32 ms

typography.css

typography.css

58 ms

lsi_dropdown.js

lsi_dropdown.js

90 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

112 ms

modernizr-2.5.3.min.js

modernizr-2.5.3.min.js

61 ms

jquery.innerfade.js

jquery.innerfade.js

65 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

64 ms

page-bkg.jpg

page-bkg.jpg

61 ms

header-bkg.jpg

header-bkg.jpg

64 ms

lst_header_logo.png

lst_header_logo.png

63 ms

promo-bkg.png

promo-bkg.png

63 ms

promo-glow.png

promo-glow.png

63 ms

promo-websites.png

promo-websites.png

102 ms

promo-boots.png

promo-boots.png

102 ms

promo-techs.png

promo-techs.png

128 ms

content_top.png

content_top.png

68 ms

content_bg.png

content_bg.png

102 ms

blueprint.png

blueprint.png

103 ms

feature-ireach.jpg

feature-ireach.jpg

104 ms

feature-cbook.jpg

feature-cbook.jpg

119 ms

feature-mlrpc.jpg

feature-mlrpc.jpg

120 ms

feature-hsbay.jpg

feature-hsbay.jpg

121 ms

medal_silver_3.png

medal_silver_3.png

121 ms

comment.png

comment.png

133 ms

content_btm.png

content_btm.png

147 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

24 ms

DroidSans.ttf

DroidSans.ttf

99 ms

DroidSans-Bold.ttf

DroidSans-Bold.ttf

127 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

js

js

77 ms

Accessibility Review

lone-star.net accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

lone-star.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lone-star.net SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lone-star.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lone-star.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lone-star.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lone Star. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: