Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

longlifelight.ru

Светодиодная продукция от производителя Long Life Light - Москва

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

817 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

306 ms

longlifelight.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to longlifelight.ru homepage info - get ready to check Long Life Light best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about longlifelight.ru

Официальный интернет-магазин производителя светодиодной продукции LLL. Производство и оптовая продажа энергосберегающих, светодиодных ламп, светильников, прожекторов, лент, LED трубок и других высокоэ...

Visit longlifelight.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Longlifelight.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 817 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

longlifelight.ru performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,730 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

longlifelight.ru

817 ms

tag.js

857 ms

common.css

242 ms

styles.css

241 ms

jquery-1.8.2.min.js

364 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Longlifelight.ru, 5% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Longlifelight.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 164.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Longlifelight.ru main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 51.1 kB

  • Original 66.1 kB
  • After minification 61.0 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 96.8 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Long Life Light images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

  • Original 289.1 kB
  • After minification 289.1 kB
  • After compression 275.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 22.1 kB
  • After minification 21.5 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Longlifelight.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (42%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

46

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Long Life Light. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

longlifelight.ru accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

longlifelight.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

longlifelight.ru SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Longlifelight.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Longlifelight.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Long Life Light. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: