3.6 sec in total
386 ms
3.1 sec
130 ms
Click here to check amazing Lookingforteam content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lookingforteam.com
Visit lookingforteam.comWe analyzed Lookingforteam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 386 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lookingforteam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value550 ms
54/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
386 ms
602 ms
380 ms
427 ms
381 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Lookingforteam.com, 19% (6 requests) were made to Bungie.net and 13% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Lookingforteam.com.
Page size can be reduced by 917.9 kB (75%)
1.2 MB
311.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Lookingforteam.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 936.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lookingforteam needs image optimization as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 738.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 738.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 118.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lookingforteam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 118.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (56%)
27
12
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lookingforteam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lookingforteam.com
386 ms
bootstrap3.css
602 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
380 ms
fullcalendar.css
427 ms
bootstrap-multiselect.css
381 ms
jquery-2.1.1.min.js
643 ms
jquery-ui-1.11.1.min.js
904 ms
moment.min.js
626 ms
fullcalendar.js
1217 ms
calendar.js
559 ms
bootstrap3.js
750 ms
jquery.ddslick.js
760 ms
bootstrap-multiselect.js
966 ms
css
62 ms
WebResource.axd
754 ms
ScriptResource.axd
890 ms
ScriptResource.axd
886 ms
css
26 ms
facebook-login.png
1308 ms
d384387da0c306ed7f6bef990be8853e.jpg
1314 ms
gold-diamond-24.gif
1308 ms
a6b42a6898eaccf128a3746842b27e7d.jpg
1336 ms
117285c72a9c89626cd7b3fa3d7226ee.jpg
1336 ms
JsonResponseExample.ashx
1358 ms
destiny-header-logo2.jpg
263 ms
4b673ae89d0ea80c483550c2104d4f4d.jpg
34 ms
38ba56821574f13db8c85cb0fce32f36.jpg
35 ms
2c73bcd2e874e640f158197bb9f2c55d.jpg
36 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
35 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
48 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
61 ms
5t8vP9Hx2udzw372glmOxA.ttf
75 ms
lookingforteam.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lookingforteam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Uses deprecated APIs
Browser errors were logged to the console
lookingforteam.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lookingforteam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Lookingforteam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lookingforteam.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lookingforteam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: