Tools & Wizards About Us
loomjet.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

loomjet.com

loomjet shop | Leading Online Shopping Platform garden trend store

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

54 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

loomjet.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Loomjet content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about loomjet.com

Shop loomjet.com for low prices every day. Free shipping orders $40 or more in store and get a discount. Open the loomjet credit card to save

Visit loomjet.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Loomjet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

loomjet.com performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,770 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.438

21/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

loomjet.com

54 ms

a1c62bd712cf9ec6155e2b3b393d9f30.css

37 ms

w.js

13 ms

jquery.min.js

81 ms

765018c2c19c9dd122c910cb2181f22b.js

198 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Loomjet.com, 8% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Pixel.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (240 ms) relates to the external source Pixel.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 175.7 kB (39%)

Content Size

446.3 kB

After Optimization

270.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Loomjet.com main page is 446.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 201.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 175.1 kB

  • Original 201.3 kB
  • After minification 200.8 kB
  • After compression 26.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 175.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 152 B

  • Original 10.3 kB
  • After minification 10.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Loomjet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 276 B

  • Original 152.8 kB
  • After minification 152.8 kB
  • After compression 152.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 133 B

  • Original 81.9 kB
  • After minification 81.9 kB
  • After compression 81.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loomjet.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Loomjet. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

loomjet.com

loomjet.com

54 ms

a1c62bd712cf9ec6155e2b3b393d9f30.css

a1c62bd712cf9ec6155e2b3b393d9f30.css

37 ms

w.js

w.js

13 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

81 ms

765018c2c19c9dd122c910cb2181f22b.js

765018c2c19c9dd122c910cb2181f22b.js

198 ms

g.gif

g.gif

240 ms

snow1.png

snow1.png

124 ms

snow2.png

snow2.png

124 ms

sparkle1.png

sparkle1.png

124 ms

sparkle2.png

sparkle2.png

131 ms

captcha.php

captcha.php

137 ms

captcha.php

captcha.php

192 ms

fl-icons.ttf

fl-icons.ttf

23 ms

Accessibility Review

loomjet.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

loomjet.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

loomjet.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loomjet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loomjet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

loomjet.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Loomjet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: