5.2 sec in total
976 ms
3.9 sec
284 ms
Visit loopyinlove.com now to see the best up-to-date Loopyinlove content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about loopyinlove.com
Find your LoopyLove with Loopy in Love Dating - possibly the best dating site you will ever visit.
Visit loopyinlove.comWe analyzed Loopyinlove.com page load time and found that the first response time was 976 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
loopyinlove.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value5.9 s
13/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value8.0 s
43/100
10%
976 ms
236 ms
292 ms
294 ms
199 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Loopyinlove.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to S1.wldcdn.net and 7% (6 requests) were made to S7.wldcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source S.wldcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 196.2 kB (29%)
676.2 kB
479.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Loopyinlove.com main page is 676.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 404.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Loopyinlove images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 95.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 95.7 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loopyinlove.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (35%)
83
54
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Loopyinlove. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.loopyinlove.com
976 ms
modernizr-2.5.3.min.js
236 ms
base.css
292 ms
HomeAdvanced.css
294 ms
carousel.css
199 ms
HomeAdvanced320.css
203 ms
jquery.min.js
36 ms
play-video.js
205 ms
base.js
395 ms
home.js
305 ms
stepcarousel.js
320 ms
siteid%7C13962_limit%7C32_var%7Cbadges_amin%7C25_amax%7C35
1892 ms
carousel_control.js
296 ms
startcarousel.js
297 ms
activity.js
297 ms
css.aspx
315 ms
show_ads.js
18 ms
page-background.jpg
421 ms
banner.jpg
317 ms
login-button.jpg
173 ms
search-button.jpg
207 ms
question-icon-white.png
168 ms
join-now-button.jpg
169 ms
icon-twitter-30.png
190 ms
ca-pub-7032136800087785.js
51 ms
zrt_lookup.html
53 ms
show_ads_impl.js
69 ms
widgets.js
15 ms
analytics.js
46 ms
tracker.js
293 ms
referral.js
298 ms
collect
71 ms
collect
88 ms
ads
369 ms
osd.js
7 ms
square.jpg
73 ms
square.jpg
64 ms
square.jpg
66 ms
square.jpg
63 ms
square.jpg
71 ms
square.jpg
62 ms
square.jpg
330 ms
square.jpg
287 ms
square.jpg
449 ms
square.jpg
61 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
34 ms
square.jpg
293 ms
square.jpg
85 ms
square.jpg
330 ms
square.jpg
450 ms
square.jpg
86 ms
square.jpg
301 ms
square.jpg
364 ms
square.jpg
85 ms
square.jpg
83 ms
square.jpg
310 ms
square.jpg
447 ms
square.jpg
303 ms
square.jpg
83 ms
arrow-button-left.jpg
127 ms
arrow-button-right.jpg
128 ms
square.jpg
303 ms
square.jpg
314 ms
square.jpg
332 ms
square.jpg
22 ms
square.jpg
302 ms
square.jpg
81 ms
square.jpg
396 ms
square.jpg
282 ms
square.jpg
80 ms
syndication
132 ms
345495272958332929
235 ms
3324081485367151730
31 ms
abg.js
42 ms
m_js_controller.js
61 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
106 ms
print.css
104 ms
s
34 ms
x_button_blue2.png
35 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
4 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
13 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
12 ms
9cLjWlop_normal.jpg
117 ms
GN3npgEI_normal.jpg
141 ms
loopyinlove.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
loopyinlove.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
loopyinlove.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loopyinlove.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loopyinlove.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
loopyinlove.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Loopyinlove. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: