5.2 sec in total
944 ms
3.9 sec
313 ms
Visit losfogg.com now to see the best up-to-date Losfogg content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about losfogg.com
Visit losfogg.comWe analyzed Losfogg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 944 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
losfogg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.0 s
100/100
10%
Value1.0 s
100/100
25%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value1.0 s
100/100
10%
944 ms
380 ms
397 ms
412 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Losfogg.com, 24% (12 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 18% (9 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Losfogg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 187.2 kB (6%)
3.0 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Losfogg.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 390 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Losfogg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 111.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 111.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Losfogg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (42%)
48
28
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Losfogg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
losfogg.com
944 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
380 ms
comments.css
397 ms
style.css
412 ms
css
23 ms
prototype.js
8 ms
scriptaculous.js
8 ms
effects.js
13 ms
lightbox.js
443 ms
jquery.js
719 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
376 ms
social.js
600 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
429 ms
visual.min.js
430 ms
builder.js
7 ms
effects.js
9 ms
dragdrop.js
16 ms
controls.js
16 ms
slider.js
19 ms
sound.js
19 ms
lightbox.css
118 ms
C149-MON-IMG_0044_.jpg
887 ms
C143-MAL-IMG_0087_.jpg
792 ms
C142-MAL-IMG_0225_.jpg
1086 ms
C137-VIE-IMG_0386_.jpg
938 ms
C135-VIE-IMG_0250_.jpg
1291 ms
C135-VIE-IMG_0082_.jpg
1177 ms
C132-CAM-IMG_0097_.jpg
1952 ms
IMG_0140.jpg
1760 ms
C131-CAM-IMG_0363_.jpg
2074 ms
C129-MAL-IMG_0111_.jpg
2362 ms
C129-MAL-IMG_0012_.jpg
2169 ms
C122-CHI-IMG_0039_.jpg
2322 ms
like.php
227 ms
widgets.js
94 ms
like.php
166 ms
like.php
149 ms
like.php
184 ms
like.php
173 ms
like.php
173 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
32 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
33 ms
entypo-custom.woff
1791 ms
like.php
186 ms
like.php
221 ms
like.php
234 ms
like.php
227 ms
like.php
239 ms
like.php
245 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
493 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
555 ms
losfogg.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
losfogg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
losfogg.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Losfogg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Spanish language. Our system also found out that Losfogg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
losfogg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Losfogg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: