6.4 sec in total
357 ms
5.6 sec
446 ms
Visit losguardo.net now to see the best up-to-date Lo Sguardo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about losguardo.net
Rivista Elettronica di Filosofia - Inschibboleth | ISSN: 2036-6558 - Rivista semestrale open access | redazione@losguardo.net
Visit losguardo.netWe analyzed Losguardo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 357 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
losguardo.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value19.1 s
0/100
10%
Value360 ms
72/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
357 ms
331 ms
858 ms
122 ms
367 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Losguardo.net, 14% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Losguardo.net.
Page size can be reduced by 130.7 kB (10%)
1.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Losguardo.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 514.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 109.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lo Sguardo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Losguardo.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (65%)
65
23
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lo Sguardo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
losguardo.net
357 ms
www.losguardo.net
331 ms
858 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
122 ms
dflzk.css
367 ms
all.css
154 ms
dflzk.css
582 ms
custom.css
344 ms
dg1zm.css
607 ms
css
41 ms
dflzl.js
604 ms
dflzk.js
356 ms
css
54 ms
dflzk.css
464 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
476 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
482 ms
index.js
586 ms
swiped-events.min.js
599 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
598 ms
effect.min.js
734 ms
ditty-news-ticker.min.js
735 ms
comment-reply.min.js
737 ms
wow.min.js
737 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
745 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
743 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
843 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
843 ms
js
39 ms
jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js
845 ms
functions.js
846 ms
plusone.js
34 ms
widgets.js
89 ms
in.js
36 ms
script.min.js
922 ms
wp-embed.min.js
922 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
969 ms
skrollr.min.js
975 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
975 ms
jquery.twbsPagination.min.js
978 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
987 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
989 ms
underscore.min.js
1077 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
1076 ms
vc_grid.min.js
1082 ms
btn_donate_SM.gif
71 ms
LoSguardoLogo-01-e1448748000283.png
496 ms
Diderot-Copertina3.jpg
790 ms
Schermata-2024-01-08-alle-15.33.41-393x230.png
676 ms
Scopus_logo.svg-300x96.png
535 ms
TR-Hi-Res1-300x78.jpg
535 ms
doaj_logo-300x91.png
536 ms
anvur1-300x108.png
543 ms
Philosophers-Index-e1477606244302.gif
647 ms
logo_wcmasthead_en.png
646 ms
ErihPlus.jpg
649 ms
Google2-300x96.png
662 ms
banner_acnp-21-150x77.jpg
766 ms
CF2-300x123.png
767 ms
MLA5.png
770 ms
pixel.gif
79 ms
sdk.js
41 ms
OpenAIREplus_logo.png
736 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-6_RUA4V-e62_gg.ttf
88 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-6_RkBI96WamXgElL.ttf
203 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-2fRkBI96WamXgElL.ttf
206 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-NfNkBI96WamXgElL.ttf
200 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-DPNkBI96WamXgElL.ttf
201 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-a_NkBI96WamXgElL.ttf
199 ms
SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7dbR799U621hGFJdv8.ttf
236 ms
SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7c8R799U621hGFJdv8.ttf
207 ms
SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7diR799U621hGFJdv8.ttf
207 ms
SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7eOQL99U621hGFJdv8.ttf
207 ms
SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7e8QL99U621hGFJdv8.ttf
205 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
853 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
939 ms
logo-white-01.png
820 ms
sdk.js
4 ms
28 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
66 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
81 ms
settings
69 ms
losguardo.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
losguardo.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
losguardo.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Losguardo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Italian language. Our system also found out that Losguardo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
losguardo.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lo Sguardo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: