Tools & Wizards About Us
losguardo.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

losguardo.net

Lo Sguardo | Rivista di Filosofia Online

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

363 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

829 ms

losguardo.net screenshot

About Website

Visit losguardo.net now to see the best up-to-date Lo Sguardo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about losguardo.net

Rivista Elettronica di Filosofia - Inschibboleth | ISSN: 2036-6558 - Rivista semestrale open access | redazione@losguardo.net

Visit losguardo.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Losguardo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 363 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

losguardo.net performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value39.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value32.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.061

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

losguardo.net

363 ms

www.losguardo.net

338 ms

966 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

121 ms

dflzk.css

351 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Losguardo.net, 13% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Losguardo.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (23%)

Content Size

7.4 MB

After Optimization

5.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Losguardo.net main page is 7.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 122.3 kB

  • Original 146.1 kB
  • After minification 138.0 kB
  • After compression 23.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 6.5 MB
  • After minification 4.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lo Sguardo needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 490.4 kB
  • After minification 490.4 kB
  • After compression 487.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 218.7 kB
  • After minification 218.6 kB
  • After compression 213.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Losguardo.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (63%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lo Sguardo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

losguardo.net

losguardo.net

363 ms

www.losguardo.net

www.losguardo.net

338 ms

966 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

121 ms

dflzk.css

dflzk.css

351 ms

all.css

all.css

43 ms

dflzk.css

dflzk.css

546 ms

custom.css

custom.css

357 ms

dg1zm.css

dg1zm.css

591 ms

css

css

50 ms

dflzl.js

dflzl.js

616 ms

dflzk.js

dflzk.js

362 ms

css

css

68 ms

dflzk.css

dflzk.css

469 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

470 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

489 ms

index.js

index.js

588 ms

swiped-events.min.js

swiped-events.min.js

647 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

709 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

709 ms

ditty-news-ticker.min.js

ditty-news-ticker.min.js

729 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

731 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

730 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

731 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

760 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

788 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

836 ms

js

js

56 ms

jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js

jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js

840 ms

functions.js

functions.js

844 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

34 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

29 ms

in.js

in.js

33 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

904 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

907 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

925 ms

skrollr.min.js

skrollr.min.js

955 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

961 ms

jquery.twbsPagination.min.js

jquery.twbsPagination.min.js

966 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

978 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

1000 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1017 ms

vc-waypoints.min.js

vc-waypoints.min.js

1072 ms

vc_grid.min.js

vc_grid.min.js

1082 ms

btn_donate_SM.gif

btn_donate_SM.gif

86 ms

LoSguardoLogo-01-e1448748000283.png

LoSguardoLogo-01-e1448748000283.png

521 ms

Esteriorizzazione.png

Esteriorizzazione.png

1460 ms

Esteriorizzazione-Lo-Sguardo-Rivista-Filosofia-393x230.png

Esteriorizzazione-Lo-Sguardo-Rivista-Filosofia-393x230.png

832 ms

Scopus_logo.svg-300x96.png

Scopus_logo.svg-300x96.png

538 ms

TR-Hi-Res1-300x78.jpg

TR-Hi-Res1-300x78.jpg

549 ms

doaj_logo-300x91.png

doaj_logo-300x91.png

561 ms

anvur1-300x108.png

anvur1-300x108.png

582 ms

Philosophers-Index-e1477606244302.gif

Philosophers-Index-e1477606244302.gif

611 ms

logo_wcmasthead_en.png

logo_wcmasthead_en.png

664 ms

ErihPlus.jpg

ErihPlus.jpg

682 ms

Google2-300x96.png

Google2-300x96.png

705 ms

banner_acnp-21-150x77.jpg

banner_acnp-21-150x77.jpg

724 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

86 ms

CF2-300x123.png

CF2-300x123.png

781 ms

MLA5.png

MLA5.png

739 ms

OpenAIREplus_logo.png

OpenAIREplus_logo.png

764 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

29 ms

SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-6_RUAw.ttf

SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-6_RUAw.ttf

47 ms

SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-6_RkBI96.ttf

SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-6_RkBI96.ttf

63 ms

SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-2fRkBI96.ttf

SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-2fRkBI96.ttf

82 ms

SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-NfNkBI96.ttf

SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-NfNkBI96.ttf

81 ms

SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-DPNkBI96.ttf

SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-DPNkBI96.ttf

77 ms

SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-a_NkBI96.ttf

SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-a_NkBI96.ttf

82 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

882 ms

SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7dbR799U60.ttf

SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7dbR799U60.ttf

81 ms

SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7c8R799U60.ttf

SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7c8R799U60.ttf

81 ms

SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7diR799U60.ttf

SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7diR799U60.ttf

97 ms

SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7eOQL99U60.ttf

SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7eOQL99U60.ttf

97 ms

SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7e8QL99U60.ttf

SlGFmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5GRwUjcdlttVFm-rI7e8QL99U60.ttf

97 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

919 ms

F.-Leoni-Henri-Bergson.-Segni-di-vita-Feltrinelli-2021--80x80.jpg

F.-Leoni-Henri-Bergson.-Segni-di-vita-Feltrinelli-2021--80x80.jpg

847 ms

X.-Guchet-Du-soin-dans-la-technique-ISTE-Editions-2021-1-1-80x80.jpeg

X.-Guchet-Du-soin-dans-la-technique-ISTE-Editions-2021-1-1-80x80.jpeg

872 ms

N.-Russo-J.-Mutchinick-a-cura-di-22Immagine-e-memoria-nellera-digitale22-80x80.jpeg

N.-Russo-J.-Mutchinick-a-cura-di-22Immagine-e-memoria-nellera-digitale22-80x80.jpeg

875 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

5 ms

logo-white-01.png

logo-white-01.png

933 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

55 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

72 ms

settings

settings

95 ms

Accessibility Review

losguardo.net accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

losguardo.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

losguardo.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Losguardo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Italian language. Our system also found out that Losguardo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

losguardo.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lo Sguardo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: