Tools & Wizards About Us
lotusproject.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 41

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

lotusproject.co.uk

Lotus Project | Esprit S1 | The Worlds Largest Lotus Esprit S1 database | Lotus Esprit Restoration

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

lotusproject.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lotus Project content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lotusproject.co.uk

The worlds largest database of Lotus Esprit S1 cars including Chassis & Registration Numbers, Mileage Colour, Photos, History and more. Join our free Lotus forum for help and advice from other members...

Visit lotusproject.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Lotusproject.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lotusproject.co.uk performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.113

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lotusproject.co.uk

1084 ms

stmenu.js

388 ms

cookie.js

264 ms

div.js

261 ms

addthis_widget.js

131 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Lotusproject.co.uk, 1% (1 request) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Lotusproject.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 691.1 kB (7%)

Content Size

9.4 MB

After Optimization

8.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Lotusproject.co.uk main page is 9.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 132.7 kB

  • Original 142.1 kB
  • After minification 129.3 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.7 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 472.9 kB

  • Original 9.2 MB
  • After minification 8.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lotus Project images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 85.5 kB

  • Original 114.3 kB
  • After minification 112.4 kB
  • After compression 28.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (3%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

90

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lotus Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lotusproject.co.uk

lotusproject.co.uk

1084 ms

stmenu.js

stmenu.js

388 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

264 ms

div.js

div.js

261 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

131 ms

stcode.js

stcode.js

482 ms

lotuslogonew.jpg

lotuslogonew.jpg

123 ms

lotus_anim.gif

lotus_anim.gif

322 ms

red.jpg

red.jpg

249 ms

seat_tartan.jpg

seat_tartan.jpg

226 ms

chassis_plate.jpg

chassis_plate.jpg

231 ms

ico_info.jpg

ico_info.jpg

225 ms

LFU%20972R%2096-01.JPG

LFU%20972R%2096-01.JPG

247 ms

LFU%20972R%2096-02.JPG

LFU%20972R%2096-02.JPG

463 ms

LFU%20972R%2096-03.JPG

LFU%20972R%2096-03.JPG

577 ms

LFU%20972R%2096-04.JPG

LFU%20972R%2096-04.JPG

711 ms

LFU%20972R%2096-05.JPG

LFU%20972R%2096-05.JPG

365 ms

LFU%20972R%2096-06.JPG

LFU%20972R%2096-06.JPG

478 ms

LFU%20972R%2097-06.JPG

LFU%20972R%2097-06.JPG

441 ms

LFU%20972R%2097-07.JPG

LFU%20972R%2097-07.JPG

484 ms

LFU%20972R%2097-08.JPG

LFU%20972R%2097-08.JPG

563 ms

LFU%20972R%2097-09.JPG

LFU%20972R%2097-09.JPG

805 ms

LFU%20972R%2097-10.JPG

LFU%20972R%2097-10.JPG

602 ms

LFU%20972R%2097-11.JPG

LFU%20972R%2097-11.JPG

622 ms

LFU%20972R%2097-12.JPG

LFU%20972R%2097-12.JPG

689 ms

LFU%20972R%2097-13.JPG

LFU%20972R%2097-13.JPG

697 ms

LFU%20972R%2097-14.JPG

LFU%20972R%2097-14.JPG

720 ms

LFU%20972R%2097-15.JPG

LFU%20972R%2097-15.JPG

741 ms

unknown.jpg

unknown.jpg

798 ms

seat_unkown.jpg

seat_unkown.jpg

810 ms

101G%2001.JPG

101G%2001.JPG

986 ms

Hill%20Racing%2001.jpg

Hill%20Racing%2001.jpg

850 ms

hill%20racing%2002.jpg

hill%20racing%2002.jpg

883 ms

hill%20racing%2003.jpg

hill%20racing%2003.jpg

914 ms

hill%20racing%2004.jpg

hill%20racing%2004.jpg

928 ms

hill%20racing%2005.jpg

hill%20racing%2005.jpg

949 ms

hill%20racing%2006.jpg

hill%20racing%2006.jpg

1007 ms

hill%20racing%2007.jpg

hill%20racing%2007.jpg

1029 ms

hill%20racing%2008.jpg

hill%20racing%2008.jpg

1046 ms

hill%20racing%2009.jpg

hill%20racing%2009.jpg

1075 ms

hill%20racing%2010.jpg

hill%20racing%2010.jpg

1099 ms

102G%2001.JPG

102G%2001.JPG

1128 ms

102G%2002.JPG

102G%2002.JPG

1029 ms

102G%2003.JPG

102G%2003.JPG

945 ms

102G%2004.JPG

102G%2004.JPG

971 ms

102G%2005.jpg

102G%2005.jpg

1009 ms

102G%2006.JPG

102G%2006.JPG

1032 ms

102G%2007.JPG

102G%2007.JPG

1074 ms

102G%2008.JPG

102G%2008.JPG

1023 ms

102G%2009.JPG

102G%2009.JPG

1001 ms

102G%2010.JPG

102G%2010.JPG

946 ms

102G%2011.JPG

102G%2011.JPG

958 ms

102G%2012.JPG

102G%2012.JPG

967 ms

102G%2013.JPG

102G%2013.JPG

988 ms

102G%2014.JPG

102G%2014.JPG

920 ms

102G%2015.JPG

102G%2015.JPG

925 ms

103G%2001.jpg

103G%2001.jpg

910 ms

103G%2002.JPG

103G%2002.JPG

969 ms

103G%2003.jpg

103G%2003.jpg

942 ms

103G%2004.JPG

103G%2004.JPG

966 ms

103G%2005.JPG

103G%2005.JPG

973 ms

103G%2006.JPG

103G%2006.JPG

1029 ms

103G%2007.JPG

103G%2007.JPG

977 ms

103G%2008.JPG

103G%2008.JPG

1084 ms

103G%2009.JPG

103G%2009.JPG

988 ms

103G%2010.JPG

103G%2010.JPG

1018 ms

103G%2011.JPG

103G%2011.JPG

1011 ms

white.jpg

white.jpg

980 ms

104G_S1_White%2001.jpg

104G_S1_White%2001.jpg

968 ms

104G_S1_White%2002.jpg

104G_S1_White%2002.jpg

1007 ms

104G_S1_White%2003.jpg

104G_S1_White%2003.jpg

1007 ms

104G_S1_White%2004.jpg

104G_S1_White%2004.jpg

1003 ms

104G_S1_White%2005.jpg

104G_S1_White%2005.jpg

967 ms

104G_S1_White%2006.jpg

104G_S1_White%2006.jpg

976 ms

107G%2001.jpg

107G%2001.jpg

975 ms

107G%2002.jpg

107G%2002.jpg

984 ms

107G%2003.jpg

107G%2003.jpg

987 ms

seat_marcasite.jpg

seat_marcasite.jpg

949 ms

77%20MF%2001.jpg

77%20MF%2001.jpg

970 ms

77%20MF%2002.jpg

77%20MF%2002.jpg

964 ms

77%20MF%2003.jpg

77%20MF%2003.jpg

949 ms

77%20MF%2004.jpg

77%20MF%2004.jpg

942 ms

77%20MF%2005.jpg

77%20MF%2005.jpg

930 ms

77%20MF%2006.jpg

77%20MF%2006.jpg

883 ms

77%20MF%2007.JPG

77%20MF%2007.JPG

931 ms

77%20MF%20100001.jpg

77%20MF%20100001.jpg

926 ms

RWO%20503R%2001.jpg

RWO%20503R%2001.jpg

931 ms

109G%2001.jpg

109G%2001.jpg

904 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

873 ms

lotusbg.jpg

lotusbg.jpg

853 ms

arrow_r.gif

arrow_r.gif

905 ms

lotus_minbg.jpg

lotus_minbg.jpg

913 ms

each_head.jpg

each_head.jpg

906 ms

plate.jpg

plate.jpg

847 ms

tail.jpg

tail.jpg

809 ms

Accessibility Review

lotusproject.co.uk accessibility score

41

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

lotusproject.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

lotusproject.co.uk SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lotusproject.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lotusproject.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

lotusproject.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lotus Project. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: