Tools & Wizards About Us
louispage.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

louispage.com

Fencing Materials Distributor | Louis E. Page, Inc.

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

352 ms

louispage.com screenshot

About Website

Visit louispage.com now to see the best up-to-date Louis Page content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about louispage.com

Discover the best fencing solutions for your property at Louis E. Page. With over 131 years of experience, we offer top-notch wire and poly mesh fencing options to keep your animals, crops, and loved ...

Visit louispage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Louispage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

louispage.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,210 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.043

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

louispage.com

50 ms

www.louispage.com

241 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

56 ms

module_-35056501883_Video.min.css

88 ms

legacyImageModule.css

114 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Louispage.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to No-cache.hubspot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (793 ms) belongs to the original domain Louispage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 235.8 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

819.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Louispage.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 609.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 89.7 kB

  • Original 106.9 kB
  • After minification 99.4 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 609.2 kB
  • After minification 593.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Louis Page images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 118.1 kB

  • Original 303.9 kB
  • After minification 303.9 kB
  • After compression 185.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.1 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 35.1 kB
  • After minification 35.1 kB
  • After compression 22.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Louispage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (54%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Louis Page. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

louispage.com

louispage.com

50 ms

www.louispage.com

www.louispage.com

241 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

jquery-1.7.1.js

56 ms

module_-35056501883_Video.min.css

module_-35056501883_Video.min.css

88 ms

legacyImageModule.css

legacyImageModule.css

114 ms

5132840899.js

5132840899.js

118 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

65 ms

css

css

63 ms

Jquery.bxslider.min.min.js

Jquery.bxslider.min.min.js

150 ms

Menu.min.js

Menu.min.js

149 ms

Tabby-css.min.css

Tabby-css.min.css

152 ms

Tabby.min.js

Tabby.min.js

91 ms

Buoy.min.js

Buoy.min.js

99 ms

layout.min.css

layout.min.css

147 ms

Louispage.css

Louispage.css

170 ms

Custom.mobile.navigation.min.css

Custom.mobile.navigation.min.css

155 ms

custom-20180907125720.min.css

custom-20180907125720.min.css

181 ms

current.js

current.js

207 ms

current.js

current.js

89 ms

seal.js

seal.js

95 ms

embed.js

embed.js

72 ms

custom-20180907.min.js

custom-20180907.min.js

174 ms

project.js

project.js

235 ms

project.js

project.js

201 ms

module_-35056501883_Video.min.js

module_-35056501883_Video.min.js

145 ms

loader.js

loader.js

97 ms

legacyImageModule.js

legacyImageModule.js

221 ms

10240.js

10240.js

298 ms

index.js

index.js

222 ms

bootstrap-cookie-consent.min.js

bootstrap-cookie-consent.min.js

793 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

110 ms

new_hubspot_logo.jpg

new_hubspot_logo.jpg

157 ms

css

css

21 ms

css

css

19 ms

home-page-salesperson-farmer.jpg

home-page-salesperson-farmer.jpg

142 ms

8d42fa4f-fd23-4931-9e38-742b090338e2.png

8d42fa4f-fd23-4931-9e38-742b090338e2.png

105 ms

blue-seal-153-100-louisepageinc-221537.png

blue-seal-153-100-louisepageinc-221537.png

32 ms

fence-installers.png

fence-installers.png

110 ms

zoos.png

zoos.png

139 ms

farms-ranches.png

farms-ranches.png

110 ms

construction.png

construction.png

110 ms

pest-control.png

pest-control.png

182 ms

homeowners.png

homeowners.png

166 ms

catalog-no-date.png

catalog-no-date.png

415 ms

Guide_to_Fencing_Materials_1_new_cover.png

Guide_to_Fencing_Materials_1_new_cover.png

464 ms

owl.jpg

owl.jpg

233 ms

deer_fence_tractor_1_-_small.jpg

deer_fence_tractor_1_-_small.jpg

232 ms

Cintoflex_deer.jpg

Cintoflex_deer.jpg

265 ms

industry-brands-1.png

industry-brands-1.png

287 ms

industry-brands-2.png

industry-brands-2.png

491 ms

industry-brands-3.png

industry-brands-3.png

359 ms

white-logo.png

white-logo.png

334 ms

393d5575-7785-424a-9926-62a8830f0880.png

393d5575-7785-424a-9926-62a8830f0880.png

141 ms

aba428ac-b38d-489c-98f9-b80db34e97e2.png

aba428ac-b38d-489c-98f9-b80db34e97e2.png

228 ms

5ef4d804-d9b3-4ddb-9d76-9807ada30f41.png

5ef4d804-d9b3-4ddb-9d76-9807ada30f41.png

165 ms

6cba92f7-b81d-4e4c-a8a1-ccddc84eb50d.png

6cba92f7-b81d-4e4c-a8a1-ccddc84eb50d.png

229 ms

footer.png

footer.png

177 ms

secure90x72.gif

secure90x72.gif

91 ms

vEF72_JTCgwQ5ejvMV0Ox_Kg1UwJ0tKfX4zNpD8E4ASzH1r93zuoyjkg.woff

vEF72_JTCgwQ5ejvMV0Ox_Kg1UwJ0tKfX4zNpD8E4ASzH1r93zuoyjkg.woff

345 ms

vEF72_JTCgwQ5ejvMV0Ox_Kg1UwJ0tKfX4zNpD8E4ASzH1r9gTuoyjkg.woff

vEF72_JTCgwQ5ejvMV0Ox_Kg1UwJ0tKfX4zNpD8E4ASzH1r9gTuoyjkg.woff

383 ms

vEF72_JTCgwQ5ejvMV0Ox_Kg1UwJ0tKfX4zNpD8E4ASzH1r9Xzyoyjkg.woff

vEF72_JTCgwQ5ejvMV0Ox_Kg1UwJ0tKfX4zNpD8E4ASzH1r9Xzyoyjkg.woff

447 ms

vEF72_JTCgwQ5ejvMV0Ox_Kg1UwJ0tKfX4zNpD8E4ASzH1r9Zjyoyjkg.woff

vEF72_JTCgwQ5ejvMV0Ox_Kg1UwJ0tKfX4zNpD8E4ASzH1r9Zjyoyjkg.woff

403 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

63 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xo.woff

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xo.woff

47 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xo.woff

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xo.woff

61 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xo.woff

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xo.woff

82 ms

ieVW2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19ehAyvMum7nfDB64UYK1X5pKg.woff

ieVW2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19ehAyvMum7nfDB64UYK1X5pKg.woff

90 ms

ieVW2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19ehAyvMum7nfDB64RgK1X5pKg.woff

ieVW2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19ehAyvMum7nfDB64RgK1X5pKg.woff

90 ms

ieVW2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19ehAyvMum7nfDB64f8N1X5pKg.woff

ieVW2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19ehAyvMum7nfDB64f8N1X5pKg.woff

89 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

89 ms

10240.js

10240.js

80 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

137 ms

10240.js

10240.js

152 ms

54 ms

29 ms

bg_direction_nav.png

bg_direction_nav.png

19 ms

Accessibility Review

louispage.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

louispage.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

louispage.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Louispage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Louispage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

louispage.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Louis Page. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: