Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

lounce.com

Agence Web à Toulouse - Création de sites internet | Verywell Digital

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

203 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

lounce.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lounce.com now to see the best up-to-date Lounce content for Tunisia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lounce.com

Nous concevons des sites internet sur mesure, uniques. Nous référençons votre site. Nous créons une stratégie marketing audacieuse et rentable.

Visit lounce.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lounce.com page load time and found that the first response time was 203 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lounce.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lounce.com

203 ms

verywell.digital

437 ms

analytics.js

38 ms

align.module.css

89 ms

fieldgroup.module.css

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Lounce.com, 86% (84 requests) were made to Verywell.digital and 3% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Verywell.digital.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 709.5 kB (28%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Lounce.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 71.0 kB

  • Original 82.1 kB
  • After minification 48.0 kB
  • After compression 11.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.1 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 67.7 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lounce images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 220.9 kB

  • Original 664.1 kB
  • After minification 623.1 kB
  • After compression 443.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 220.9 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 350.0 kB

  • Original 397.2 kB
  • After minification 350.9 kB
  • After compression 47.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lounce.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 350.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (68%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lounce. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lounce.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

lounce.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lounce.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lounce.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Lounce.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lounce. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: