4.4 sec in total
589 ms
3.5 sec
307 ms
Visit love.hu now to see the best up-to-date Love content for Hungary and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about love.hu
Visit love.huWe analyzed Love.hu page load time and found that the first response time was 589 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
love.hu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value810 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.216
58/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
589 ms
540 ms
575 ms
577 ms
722 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Love.hu, 33% (32 requests) were made to Static.love.hu and 22% (21 requests) were made to Tn.love.hu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Tn.love.hu.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (53%)
2.1 MB
976.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Love.hu main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Love images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 742.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 742.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 256.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Love.hu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 256.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (37%)
90
57
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Love. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
love.hu
589 ms
jquery-ui.css
540 ms
login-main.css
575 ms
login-uniform.css
577 ms
jquery.js
722 ms
jquery-ui.js
850 ms
jquery.uniform.js
621 ms
hu.js
651 ms
love.js
825 ms
love-login.js
709 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
63 ms
love-login-roulette.js
742 ms
love-login-footer.js
761 ms
recaptcha_ajax.js
33 ms
plusone.js
59 ms
ptn.jpg
225 ms
tn_63843452639410917754.jpg
773 ms
ajax_loader.gif
224 ms
logo_winter.png
291 ms
stat.png
209 ms
login_android.png
514 ms
tn_6967637764584733961.jpg
778 ms
tn_3713779446767383135.jpg
784 ms
tn_87765886884110781080.jpg
778 ms
tn_11963398982610984100.jpg
799 ms
tn_37627759426810783427.jpg
797 ms
tn_55861222385110883397.jpg
887 ms
tn_15634459662910918003.jpg
893 ms
tn_17859513328510931561.jpg
891 ms
tn_57536844662711211068.jpg
901 ms
tn_3249575458298914891.jpg
912 ms
tn_28926251977310798923.jpg
917 ms
tn_96291321894811062255.jpg
1003 ms
tn_21387936522710764986.jpg
1006 ms
tn_48156246512210837946.jpg
1006 ms
tn_43298637556610746279.jpg
1018 ms
tn_7797935926956963703.jpg
1028 ms
tn_28135146678110932569.jpg
1035 ms
btn_orange_sprite.png
215 ms
angyalka__2.png
403 ms
bg_header_red.png
417 ms
bg_header_yellow.png
402 ms
widgets.js
192 ms
like.php
363 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
141 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
164 ms
follow
176 ms
myriad.woff
349 ms
wpmfrwdpgxw
241 ms
bg_loverulett.png
661 ms
reg_single_sprite.png
479 ms
reg_couple_sprite.png
481 ms
button_reg.png
481 ms
heart.png
476 ms
otp_footer.png
584 ms
logo_footer__2.png
596 ms
ga.js
259 ms
xgemius.js
732 ms
getregion.php
332 ms
getregion.php
466 ms
login_roulette.php
473 ms
login_roulette.php
747 ms
designed_select_arrow.png
482 ms
designed_radiobutton_sprite.png
482 ms
designed_checkbox_sprite.png
482 ms
rs=AGLTcCNl_AHre25FUokWmrWYr-j7FwRc3w
23 ms
rs=AGLTcCPhDrHY2vagSjsLFOxeufqSzVU3ow
62 ms
rs=AGLTcCOmkss6tTm2NOu2yyIyuSrJ2-OQeQ
90 ms
postmessageRelay
230 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
42 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
182 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
194 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
212 ms
www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css
201 ms
www-embed-player.js
226 ms
base.js
285 ms
__utm.gif
99 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.hu.html
78 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
589 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
635 ms
api.js
101 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
117 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
45 ms
jot
127 ms
6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js
20 ms
ad_status.js
55 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
46 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
46 ms
fpdata.js
145 ms
lsget.html
523 ms
login_roulette_sprite.png
125 ms
4783999171818364467267139876552.jpg
724 ms
tn_52375332614811239625.jpg
196 ms
tn_24966941968610659581.jpg
196 ms
tn_1648888383579140527.jpg
195 ms
rexdot.js
124 ms
light-bottom.css
4 ms
love.hu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
love.hu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
love.hu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
HU
HU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Love.hu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Hungarian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Love.hu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
love.hu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Love. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: