Tools & Wizards About Us
lovebirdsblog.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

lovebirdsblog.com

login

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

446 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

488 ms

lovebirdsblog.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lovebirdsblog.com homepage info - get ready to check Lovebirdsblog best content for Pakistan right away, or after learning these important things about lovebirdsblog.com

Just another WordPress site

Visit lovebirdsblog.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lovebirdsblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 446 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lovebirdsblog.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

lovebirdsblog.com

446 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

76 ms

app.css

51 ms

style.css

100 ms

flexslider.css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Lovebirdsblog.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Html5shim.googlecode.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (446 ms) belongs to the original domain Lovebirdsblog.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 335.5 kB (44%)

Content Size

762.1 kB

After Optimization

426.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lovebirdsblog.com main page is 762.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 327.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 62.5 kB

  • Original 71.7 kB
  • After minification 62.4 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 327.8 kB
  • After minification 313.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lovebirdsblog images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 128.0 kB

  • Original 202.4 kB
  • After minification 196.2 kB
  • After compression 74.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 128.0 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 130.6 kB

  • Original 160.3 kB
  • After minification 140.3 kB
  • After compression 29.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lovebirdsblog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (34%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lovebirdsblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lovebirdsblog.com

lovebirdsblog.com

446 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

76 ms

app.css

app.css

51 ms

style.css

style.css

100 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

51 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

78 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

53 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

125 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

147 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

78 ms

customscript.js

customscript.js

96 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

131 ms

html5.js

html5.js

21 ms

css

css

30 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

63 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

56 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

78 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

105 ms

e-201609.js

e-201609.js

11 ms

js15.js

js15.js

20 ms

pattern33.png

pattern33.png

56 ms

nm.gif

nm.gif

56 ms

2-634x280.jpg

2-634x280.jpg

55 ms

2-15-634x280.jpg

2-15-634x280.jpg

58 ms

18-634x280.jpg

18-634x280.jpg

54 ms

26-634x280.jpg

26-634x280.jpg

57 ms

113-500x280.jpg

113-500x280.jpg

358 ms

2-124x74.jpg

2-124x74.jpg

360 ms

2-15-124x74.jpg

2-15-124x74.jpg

359 ms

18-124x74.jpg

18-124x74.jpg

359 ms

26-124x74.jpg

26-124x74.jpg

360 ms

113-124x74.jpg

113-124x74.jpg

362 ms

2-19-203x150.jpg

2-19-203x150.jpg

362 ms

1-20-203x150.jpg

1-20-203x150.jpg

365 ms

1-19-203x150.jpg

1-19-203x150.jpg

364 ms

2-203x150.jpg

2-203x150.jpg

362 ms

1-17-203x150.jpg

1-17-203x150.jpg

362 ms

1-16-203x150.jpg

1-16-203x150.jpg

363 ms

1-15-203x150.jpg

1-15-203x150.jpg

366 ms

2-13-203x150.jpg

2-13-203x150.jpg

368 ms

5-3-203x150.jpg

5-3-203x150.jpg

366 ms

1-14-203x150.jpg

1-14-203x150.jpg

364 ms

2-65x65.jpg

2-65x65.jpg

367 ms

2-19-65x65.jpg

2-19-65x65.jpg

367 ms

1-20-65x65.jpg

1-20-65x65.jpg

368 ms

1-19-65x65.jpg

1-19-65x65.jpg

367 ms

1-17-65x65.jpg

1-17-65x65.jpg

368 ms

1-16-65x65.jpg

1-16-65x65.jpg

368 ms

1-15-65x65.jpg

1-15-65x65.jpg

370 ms

2-13-65x65.jpg

2-13-65x65.jpg

369 ms

5-3-65x65.jpg

5-3-65x65.jpg

370 ms

1-14-65x65.jpg

1-14-65x65.jpg

370 ms

nobg.png

nobg.png

372 ms

0.php

0.php

30 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

337 ms

g.gif

g.gif

293 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

48 ms

services.css

services.css

53 ms

SEO Factors

lovebirdsblog.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovebirdsblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lovebirdsblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lovebirdsblog.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lovebirdsblog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: