Tools & Wizards About Us
lovelaceeng.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

lovelaceeng.com

Lovelace Engineering Services | San Diego Engineering Firm

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

191 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

546 ms

lovelaceeng.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lovelace Eng content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lovelaceeng.com

Lovelace Engineering is a San Diego-based structural engineering firm committed to providing clients the highest level of service and technical expertise.

Visit lovelaceeng.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lovelaceeng.com page load time and found that the first response time was 191 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lovelaceeng.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.576

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lovelaceeng.com

191 ms

lovelaceeng.com

1617 ms

js

170 ms

style.css

14 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Lovelaceeng.com, 29% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Lovelaceeng.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 271.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

5.5 MB

After Optimization

5.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lovelaceeng.com main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 178.0 kB

  • Original 210.3 kB
  • After minification 206.4 kB
  • After compression 32.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 90.7 kB

  • Original 5.2 MB
  • After minification 5.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lovelace Eng images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 87.7 kB
  • After minification 87.7 kB
  • After compression 85.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 647 B

  • Original 16.9 kB
  • After minification 16.9 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lovelaceeng.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (31%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lovelace Eng. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lovelaceeng.com

lovelaceeng.com

191 ms

lovelaceeng.com

lovelaceeng.com

1617 ms

js

js

170 ms

style.css

style.css

14 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

35 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

49 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

34 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

40 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

60 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

32 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

34 ms

salvattore.js

salvattore.js

60 ms

common.js

common.js

88 ms

embed

embed

291 ms

bg-header.png

bg-header.png

101 ms

lovelace-engineering-logo.png

lovelace-engineering-logo.png

136 ms

view.jpg

view.jpg

139 ms

bg-quote.png

bg-quote.png

137 ms

J07239-Spindrift-5.jpg

J07239-Spindrift-5.jpg

139 ms

Alce-101a-featured.jpg

Alce-101a-featured.jpg

137 ms

newport-restaurant-featured.jpg

newport-restaurant-featured.jpg

140 ms

zoo.jpg

zoo.jpg

194 ms

hottub.jpg

hottub.jpg

184 ms

CARMEL-VALLEY-CUSTOM-HOME.jpg

CARMEL-VALLEY-CUSTOM-HOME.jpg

186 ms

J07239-Spindrift-1.jpg

J07239-Spindrift-1.jpg

185 ms

Mark-Silva_First-Impression_8.jpg.rend_.hgtvcom.1280.1280.jpg

Mark-Silva_First-Impression_8.jpg.rend_.hgtvcom.1280.1280.jpg

186 ms

20131025_bf_460_pa_0321.jpg

20131025_bf_460_pa_0321.jpg

185 ms

2725_Rear_Elev.jpg

2725_Rear_Elev.jpg

210 ms

J14287-Pala-Wine-Cave-1.jpg

J14287-Pala-Wine-Cave-1.jpg

209 ms

CAF-01.jpg

CAF-01.jpg

209 ms

palace.jpg

palace.jpg

207 ms

bg-transparent1.png

bg-transparent1.png

207 ms

social-_sprite.png

social-_sprite.png

222 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9.woff

137 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf

178 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w9.woff

185 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf

191 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w9.woff

190 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf

191 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff

190 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf

187 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff

188 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

202 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff

202 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

201 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff

201 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

203 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew9.woff

201 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf

217 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw9.woff

216 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf

217 ms

blueprint-bg.jpg

blueprint-bg.jpg

127 ms

Sorrento-Heights-3676.jpg

Sorrento-Heights-3676.jpg

126 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

96 ms

grass.jpg

grass.jpg

94 ms

porch.jpg

porch.jpg

108 ms

starbucks.jpg

starbucks.jpg

109 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

517 ms

js

js

28 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

4 ms

search.js

search.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

13 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

11 ms

Accessibility Review

lovelaceeng.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lovelaceeng.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lovelaceeng.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovelaceeng.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lovelaceeng.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lovelaceeng.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lovelace Eng. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: