Tools & Wizards About Us
lovelist.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

lovelist.com

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

270 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

406 ms

lovelist.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lovelist.com homepage info - get ready to check Lovelist best content right away, or after learning these important things about lovelist.com

Visit lovelist.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lovelist.com page load time and found that the first response time was 270 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lovelist.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lovelist.com

270 ms

spc_trans.gif

31 ms

LOVELIST.COM.jpg

751 ms

img.aspx

133 ms

new_gd_logo_greybkg.png

13 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Lovelist.com, 67% (6 requests) were made to Ak2.imgaft.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (751 ms) belongs to the original domain Lovelist.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 75.2 kB (89%)

Content Size

84.2 kB

After Optimization

9.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Lovelist.com main page is 84.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 79.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 74.3 kB

  • Original 79.9 kB
  • After minification 27.2 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 52.7 kB, which is 66% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.3 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 922 B

  • Original 4.3 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lovelist needs image optimization as it can save up to 922 B or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lovelist. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

lovelist.com

lovelist.com

270 ms

spc_trans.gif

spc_trans.gif

31 ms

LOVELIST.COM.jpg

LOVELIST.COM.jpg

751 ms

img.aspx

img.aspx

133 ms

new_gd_logo_greybkg.png

new_gd_logo_greybkg.png

13 ms

btn_go_yel.gif

btn_go_yel.gif

13 ms

txt_domainnames_opw.gif

txt_domainnames_opw.gif

17 ms

txt_transfers_opw.gif

txt_transfers_opw.gif

14 ms

bul_white_black.gif

bul_white_black.gif

16 ms

Accessibility Review

lovelist.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

lovelist.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lovelist.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovelist.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Lovelist.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lovelist.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lovelist. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: