Tools & Wizards About Us
lovers.ws screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

lovers.ws

Online Dating at lovers Dating Website

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

729 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

154 ms

lovers.ws screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lovers content for Egypt. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lovers.ws

Online Dating at lovers Dating Website Find single members with photo, chat online and date out. Good luck!

Visit lovers.ws

Key Findings

We analyzed Lovers.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 729 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lovers.ws performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lovers.ws

729 ms

826539FD%25%25sign_in.style.css

96 ms

B97EE44A%25%25forgot_password.style.css

192 ms

10196301%25%25interface.style.css

288 ms

954990CB%25%25index.style.css

286 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Lovers.ws and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (756 ms) belongs to the original domain Lovers.ws.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 125.7 kB (20%)

Content Size

625.1 kB

After Optimization

499.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lovers.ws main page is 625.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 470.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 29.8 kB

  • Original 37.6 kB
  • After minification 36.5 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 45.8 kB

  • Original 470.8 kB
  • After minification 425.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lovers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 49.1 kB

  • Original 105.9 kB
  • After minification 104.4 kB
  • After compression 56.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 49.1 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 986 B

  • Original 10.8 kB
  • After minification 10.7 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lovers.ws has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (70%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lovers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.lovers.ws

www.lovers.ws

729 ms

826539FD%25%25sign_in.style.css

826539FD%25%25sign_in.style.css

96 ms

B97EE44A%25%25forgot_password.style.css

B97EE44A%25%25forgot_password.style.css

192 ms

10196301%25%25interface.style.css

10196301%25%25interface.style.css

288 ms

954990CB%25%25index.style.css

954990CB%25%25index.style.css

286 ms

716D03CE%25%25page_header.style.css

716D03CE%25%25page_header.style.css

289 ms

0F7D975C%25%25inventory.style.css

0F7D975C%25%25inventory.style.css

289 ms

01C551C8%25%25menu-line.style.css

01C551C8%25%25menu-line.style.css

290 ms

DDC58E77%25%25menu-tabs.style.css

DDC58E77%25%25menu-tabs.style.css

380 ms

B87E2585%25%25quick_search.style.css

B87E2585%25%25quick_search.style.css

381 ms

CADB2AD9%25%25menu-line-bottom.style.css

CADB2AD9%25%25menu-line-bottom.style.css

382 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

580 ms

jquery.browser.js

jquery.browser.js

382 ms

interface.js

interface.js

383 ms

json2.js

json2.js

474 ms

component_handler.js

component_handler.js

475 ms

Ping.cmp.js

Ping.cmp.js

476 ms

jquery.form.js

jquery.form.js

478 ms

form_handler.js

form_handler.js

478 ms

622D9B8F%25%25form_ForgotPassword.js

622D9B8F%25%25form_ForgotPassword.js

568 ms

C21D8BEB%25%25form_SignIn.js

C21D8BEB%25%25form_SignIn.js

569 ms

SignIn.cmp.js

SignIn.cmp.js

570 ms

10379A4F%25%25form_QuickSearch.js

10379A4F%25%25form_QuickSearch.js

574 ms

dev_toolbar.js

dev_toolbar.js

573 ms

inner_bg.jpg

inner_bg.jpg

285 ms

inventory_line_bg.png

inventory_line_bg.png

96 ms

logo.png

logo.png

97 ms

menu.png

menu.png

98 ms

index_box_top_bg.png

index_box_top_bg.png

98 ms

promo.png

promo.png

756 ms

button.gif

button.gif

190 ms

block_bot_l.png

block_bot_l.png

207 ms

index_box_buttom_bg.png

index_box_buttom_bg.png

192 ms

ficon.png

ficon.png

191 ms

ticon.png

ticon.png

193 ms

yt.png

yt.png

191 ms

gplus.png

gplus.png

193 ms

linkkin.png

linkkin.png

193 ms

not_found.html

not_found.html

395 ms

not_found.html

not_found.html

392 ms

not_found.html

not_found.html

381 ms

Accessibility Review

lovers.ws accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lovers.ws best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

lovers.ws SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovers.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lovers.ws main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lovers.ws

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lovers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: