Tools & Wizards About Us
loves.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 3

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 42

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

loves.com

Love's Travel Stops

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

587 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

380 ms

loves.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to loves.com homepage info - get ready to check Love S best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about loves.com

Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Founded in 1964, Love’s has more than 510 locations in 41 states. Love’s provides professional truck drivers and motor...

Visit loves.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Loves.com page load time and found that the first response time was 587 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

loves.com performance score

3

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value29.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.2 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value14,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.504

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value43.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.loves.com

587 ms

ee-not-sword-not-forgotter-and-where-What-hee-th

73 ms

font-awesome.min.css

161 ms

vendor.min.css

199 ms

site.min.css

164 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Loves.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 5% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Loves.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 571.8 kB (12%)

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

4.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Loves.com main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 62.1 kB

  • Original 73.4 kB
  • After minification 48.7 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.8 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 358.3 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Love S images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 151.0 kB

  • Original 671.5 kB
  • After minification 670.6 kB
  • After compression 520.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 151.0 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 368 B

  • Original 77.0 kB
  • After minification 76.9 kB
  • After compression 76.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loves.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (73%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Love S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.loves.com

www.loves.com

587 ms

ee-not-sword-not-forgotter-and-where-What-hee-th

ee-not-sword-not-forgotter-and-where-What-hee-th

73 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

161 ms

vendor.min.css

vendor.min.css

199 ms

site.min.css

site.min.css

164 ms

wuz3hhq.css

wuz3hhq.css

161 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

153 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

161 ms

angular.min.js

angular.min.js

340 ms

ui-bootstrap-tpls.min.js

ui-bootstrap-tpls.min.js

361 ms

adrum-latest.js

adrum-latest.js

150 ms

js

js

242 ms

foundation.js

foundation.js

147 ms

foundation-datepicker.js

foundation-datepicker.js

187 ms

foundation.reveal.js

foundation.reveal.js

276 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

286 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

185 ms

moment-duration-format.js

moment-duration-format.js

239 ms

app.js

app.js

255 ms

components.module.js

components.module.js

240 ms

Routes.js

Routes.js

245 ms

osano.js

osano.js

556 ms

up_loader.1.1.0.js

up_loader.1.1.0.js

146 ms

index.js

index.js

158 ms

js

js

176 ms

t.js

t.js

152 ms

index.js

index.js

173 ms

css

css

165 ms

VisitorIdentification.js

VisitorIdentification.js

237 ms

maps

maps

262 ms

quickSearch

quickSearch

240 ms

core.module.js

core.module.js

276 ms

constants.js

constants.js

288 ms

home.module.js

home.module.js

297 ms

embed.js

embed.js

141 ms

vendor.min.js

vendor.min.js

319 ms

site.min.js

site.min.js

404 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

20 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

51 ms

wuz3hhq.css

wuz3hhq.css

35 ms

p.css

p.css

97 ms

js

js

87 ms

logo_top.ashx

logo_top.ashx

218 ms

CVSA2024_2000x800.ashx

CVSA2024_2000x800.ashx

1664 ms

APP24_FuelDisc_Web_500x300_022024DP.ashx

APP24_FuelDisc_Web_500x300_022024DP.ashx

407 ms

Store894_500x300.ashx

Store894_500x300.ashx

207 ms

60thAnniversary_500x300.ashx

60thAnniversary_500x300.ashx

405 ms

hero_2000x600.ashx

hero_2000x600.ashx

408 ms

Careers_2_500x300.ashx

Careers_2_500x300.ashx

407 ms

Fleet500x300.ashx

Fleet500x300.ashx

407 ms

Loves_Connect_2_500x300.ashx

Loves_Connect_2_500x300.ashx

1655 ms

LEX23_16c_500x300_061423DP.ashx

LEX23_16c_500x300_061423DP.ashx

1670 ms

About-Loves-Family-of-Companies.ashx

About-Loves-Family-of-Companies.ashx

1653 ms

WEB23_FacebookIcon_White_060223JM.ashx

WEB23_FacebookIcon_White_060223JM.ashx

1657 ms

WEB23_InstagramIcon_White_060223JM.ashx

WEB23_InstagramIcon_White_060223JM.ashx

1654 ms

WEB23_X_Icon_White_120623.ashx

WEB23_X_Icon_White_120623.ashx

1664 ms

WEB23_TikTokIcon_White_060223JM.ashx

WEB23_TikTokIcon_White_060223JM.ashx

1670 ms

WEB23_YouTubeIcon_White_060223JM.ashx

WEB23_YouTubeIcon_White_060223JM.ashx

1674 ms

WEB23_LinkedInIcon_White_060223JM.ashx

WEB23_LinkedInIcon_White_060223JM.ashx

1676 ms

d

d

159 ms

d

d

162 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

160 ms

undefined

undefined

1289 ms

generic1711466374833.js

generic1711466374833.js

71 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

82 ms

foundation.min.css

foundation.min.css

69 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

149 ms

layoutcss

layoutcss

66 ms

site.min.css

site.min.css

141 ms

wuz3hhq.css

wuz3hhq.css

63 ms

foundation.js

foundation.js

81 ms

foundation-datepicker.js

foundation-datepicker.js

81 ms

foundation.reveal.js

foundation.reveal.js

180 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

180 ms

moment-duration-format.js

moment-duration-format.js

181 ms

modalPopup.js

modalPopup.js

197 ms

controllerscripts

controllerscripts

179 ms

site.min.js

site.min.js

231 ms

adrum-ext.8ad16b8375327e66a32816a8ad7be617.js

adrum-ext.8ad16b8375327e66a32816a8ad7be617.js

56 ms

footer.png

footer.png

1634 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

89 ms

undefined

undefined

146 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1383 ms

foundation.min.css

foundation.min.css

64 ms

vendor.min.js

vendor.min.js

1383 ms

Accessibility Review

loves.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

loves.com best practices score

42

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

loves.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loves.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loves.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

loves.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Love S. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: