Tools & Wizards About Us
lovesailing.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

lovesailing.net

We Love Sailing - Dedicated to Learning Sailing Theory

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

140 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

110 ms

lovesailing.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lovesailing.net homepage info - get ready to check Love Sailing best content for Singapore right away, or after learning these important things about lovesailing.net

Learn sailing theory to help you through your Competent Crew or Day Skipper tests or to just improve your confidence.

Visit lovesailing.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lovesailing.net page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lovesailing.net performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lovesailing.net

140 ms

js

58 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

194 ms

main.min.js

101 ms

cookies.min.js

123 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Lovesailing.net, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (736 ms) belongs to the original domain Lovesailing.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 34.6 kB (39%)

Content Size

88.4 kB

After Optimization

53.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Lovesailing.net main page is 88.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 36.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 15.7 kB
  • After minification 14.5 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 36.0 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Love Sailing needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 48% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 36.7 kB
  • After minification 36.7 kB
  • After compression 31.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (86%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Love Sailing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lovesailing.net

lovesailing.net

140 ms

js

js

58 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

194 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

101 ms

cookies.min.js

cookies.min.js

123 ms

style.css

style.css

125 ms

css

css

46 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

125 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

493 ms

grid.min.css

grid.min.css

182 ms

adverts.min.css

adverts.min.css

205 ms

navigation.min.css

navigation.min.css

205 ms

navigation-iconbar.min.css

navigation-iconbar.min.css

208 ms

navigation-desktop.min.css

navigation-desktop.min.css

266 ms

navigation-mobile.min.css

navigation-mobile.min.css

274 ms

forms.min.css

forms.min.css

287 ms

icons.min.css

icons.min.css

287 ms

images.min.css

images.min.css

288 ms

panels.min.css

panels.min.css

350 ms

notices.min.css

notices.min.css

359 ms

lists.min.css

lists.min.css

367 ms

links.min.css

links.min.css

736 ms

tags.min.css

tags.min.css

371 ms

table.min.css

table.min.css

431 ms

typography.min.css

typography.min.css

442 ms

footer.min.css

footer.min.css

448 ms

home.min.css

home.min.css

454 ms

love-sailing-logo.png

love-sailing-logo.png

545 ms

love-sailing-logo-white.png

love-sailing-logo-white.png

548 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

19 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

101 ms

Accessibility Review

lovesailing.net accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lovesailing.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lovesailing.net SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovesailing.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lovesailing.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lovesailing.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: