21.7 sec in total
145 ms
21.3 sec
295 ms
Click here to check amazing Love To content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about loveto.camp
Check out our latest stories and guides about camping, hiking, backpacking, and more. Get out there and camp!
Visit loveto.campWe analyzed Loveto.camp page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 21.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
loveto.camp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value4.9 s
29/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value400 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.056
98/100
15%
Value10.3 s
25/100
10%
145 ms
832 ms
48 ms
18461 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Loveto.camp, 9% (5 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (18.5 sec) relates to the external source A.vimeocdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 254.5 kB (8%)
3.3 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Loveto.camp main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 185.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Love To images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 945 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loveto.camp has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (64%)
50
18
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Love To. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
loveto.camp
145 ms
www.loveto.camp
832 ms
player_api
48 ms
froogaloop2.min.js
18461 ms
styles.min.css
74 ms
theme-font-icons.min.css
142 ms
style.min.css
252 ms
theme-options-production.css
191 ms
style.css
191 ms
custom.css
191 ms
jquery.min.js
264 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
206 ms
js_composer.min.css
393 ms
core.min.js
265 ms
tabs.min.js
266 ms
skrollr-min.js
269 ms
jquery.nicescroll.js
319 ms
SmoothScroll.js
329 ms
plugins-ck.js
459 ms
theme-scripts-ck.js
398 ms
custom.js
343 ms
menu.min.js
386 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
397 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
415 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
456 ms
dom-ready.min.js
463 ms
hooks.min.js
468 ms
i18n.min.js
468 ms
a11y.min.js
489 ms
autocomplete.min.js
528 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
530 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
531 ms
www-widgetapi.js
4 ms
webfont.js
30 ms
styles.min-blessed1.css
326 ms
css
32 ms
gtm.js
203 ms
193 ms
Love-To-Camp-Logo-1.png
298 ms
camping-gifts-for-campers-featured-qfzjyy9oak20sr0jvgquxi964c8t49cq2qwb0c65v0-qfzl0g1wwndrwsjwxo74e1n35nfw5m79wbpk5oktnw.jpg
585 ms
man-sleeping-on-camping-cot-mo8lh3wbogz5os05woe664kh96yigaxnyxudgek0to-mpcm0baenmbhldm5klrb94xo2xjbf3dvm6akfwe8mk.jpg
686 ms
lovetocamp-2016-hiking-camping-outdoor-goals-ml6xalyhrjkafoakjrbb4rt4sbt4yttumhnk20skks-mp3vyzbr6e669r8ort8rvzxtek2wa9zzxz3xv2xa24.jpg
750 ms
lovetocamp-reflecting-2015-outdoor-adventures-mkt9oxumi2sdax59icddh7u8b7dc44b2f5pdv3az3g-mp3vz09ld87gld7bmbneghp9zxy9hz3qa3rfccvvvw.jpg
752 ms
free-admission-national-parks-mjquj0ghvanky9lr2n7aejid6faunxv723ky5h99v0-mp3vz09ld87gld7bmbneghp9zxy9hz3qa3rfccvvvw.jpg
753 ms
how-to-choose-the-best-camping-stove-mj5i3argwj46w6owqco92vtcj8842xu9bfg3swis6k-mp3vz17fk28qwz5ygu210zgqlbtmpo7gm8ewtmuhpo.jpg
696 ms
how-to-wear-a-buff-mj59m896s9hys9tm4hf9tv7nt7vhveqgph2wjwunn0-mp3vz17fk28qwz5ygu210zgqlbtmpo7gm8ewtmuhpo.jpg
655 ms
how-to-make-a-swedish-torch-log-mj5bgogfxmgpjvat3pgslljrmucn13jc6ddmx4bprg-mp3vz17fk28qwz5ygu210zgqlbtmpo7gm8ewtmuhpo.jpg
720 ms
visit-state-park-midnw6uas9jayhlzdyihybkaydk700a1kf43krdjjg-mp3vz333xqbbk7385uva5yzns3kd52exahpvs6rpd8.jpg
813 ms
tips-for-camping-with-a-baby-mj5ftzq1qftamgsli7g0eefypcz49h244zy3d92qek-mp3vz333xqbbk7385uva5yzns3kd52exahpvs6rpd8.jpg
762 ms
c1d524d11a2528e68090de75d82872f0
298 ms
e565ef4e20a11861e18116b28bb70fd3
524 ms
7f6bf11cb72de462036ca91bbc77bf4f
450 ms
3137a45c9b744914848e66c59c28da38
327 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbfOLjOWw.woff
223 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8RHYOLjOWw.woff
247 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJBkqs.woff
249 ms
ArtbeesWPTokens.woff
709 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
741 ms
loveto.camp accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
loveto.camp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
loveto.camp SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loveto.camp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loveto.camp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
loveto.camp
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Love To. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: