Tools & Wizards About Us
lovingtouchvets.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

lovingtouchvets.com

Loving Touch Animal Hospital – Fredericksburg Animal Hospital

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

141 ms

Resources Loaded

853 ms

Page Rendered

842 ms

lovingtouchvets.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lovingtouchvets.com homepage info - get ready to check Loving Touch Vets best content right away, or after learning these important things about lovingtouchvets.com

Visit lovingtouchvets.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lovingtouchvets.com page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lovingtouchvets.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.6 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,330 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.11

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value30.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lovingtouchvets.com

141 ms

sgr.css

22 ms

jxt6kay.css

113 ms

style.min.css

49 ms

theme.min.css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Lovingtouchvets.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (284 ms) belongs to the original domain Lovingtouchvets.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 492.9 kB (8%)

Content Size

6.2 MB

After Optimization

5.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lovingtouchvets.com main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 105.2 kB

  • Original 122.4 kB
  • After minification 115.7 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 386.7 kB

  • Original 5.9 MB
  • After minification 5.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Loving Touch Vets images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 381 B

  • Original 126.9 kB
  • After minification 126.9 kB
  • After compression 126.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 702 B

  • Original 58.9 kB
  • After minification 58.9 kB
  • After compression 58.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lovingtouchvets.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (66%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Loving Touch Vets. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lovingtouchvets.com

lovingtouchvets.com

141 ms

sgr.css

sgr.css

22 ms

jxt6kay.css

jxt6kay.css

113 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

49 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

48 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

44 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

30 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

39 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

36 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

45 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

51 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

54 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

70 ms

apple-webkit.min.css

apple-webkit.min.css

59 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

64 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

61 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

64 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

69 ms

fadeIn.min.css

fadeIn.min.css

71 ms

widget-call-to-action.min.css

widget-call-to-action.min.css

83 ms

transitions.min.css

transitions.min.css

78 ms

widget-flip-box.min.css

widget-flip-box.min.css

80 ms

widget-media-carousel.min.css

widget-media-carousel.min.css

81 ms

widget-carousel-module-base.min.css

widget-carousel-module-base.min.css

83 ms

fadeInLeft.min.css

fadeInLeft.min.css

83 ms

widget-form.min.css

widget-form.min.css

93 ms

post-8.css

post-8.css

96 ms

post-24.css

post-24.css

95 ms

post-119.css

post-119.css

94 ms

css

css

45 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

98 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

102 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

106 ms

sgr.js

sgr.js

105 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

107 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

106 ms

platform.js

platform.js

29 ms

post-92.css

post-92.css

111 ms

sticky.min.css

sticky.min.css

107 ms

popup.min.css

popup.min.css

116 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

108 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

92 ms

platform.js

platform.js

40 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

89 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

94 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

159 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

162 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

153 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

155 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

154 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

151 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

147 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

148 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

146 ms

p.css

p.css

22 ms

Artboard-9@2x.png

Artboard-9@2x.png

58 ms

Artboard-8.png

Artboard-8.png

150 ms

Artboard-7-1024x569.png

Artboard-7-1024x569.png

151 ms

Artboard-12@2x.png

Artboard-12@2x.png

152 ms

Artboard-13@2x.png

Artboard-13@2x.png

153 ms

Artboard-14@2x.png

Artboard-14@2x.png

192 ms

Artboard-11@2x.png

Artboard-11@2x.png

155 ms

Artboard-15@2x.png

Artboard-15@2x.png

210 ms

Artboard-16@2x.png

Artboard-16@2x.png

229 ms

Artboard-12.png

Artboard-12.png

207 ms

Artboard-17@2x-845x1024.png

Artboard-17@2x-845x1024.png

227 ms

DOLLY.jpeg

DOLLY.jpeg

206 ms

Flo-and-Emilie.jpeg

Flo-and-Emilie.jpeg

228 ms

jammie.jpeg

jammie.jpeg

229 ms

tour_1.jpeg

tour_1.jpeg

229 ms

Opal-and-Mavi.jpeg

Opal-and-Mavi.jpeg

258 ms

Sasha.jpg

Sasha.jpg

259 ms

Ginger-and-Joy.jpg

Ginger-and-Joy.jpg

260 ms

Princess-Buttercup.jpg

Princess-Buttercup.jpg

259 ms

Artboard-20@2x.png

Artboard-20@2x.png

260 ms

Artboard-18@2x.png

Artboard-18@2x.png

279 ms

Artboard-19@2x.png

Artboard-19@2x.png

284 ms

Artboard-13.png

Artboard-13.png

260 ms

Artboard-124@2x-300x193.png

Artboard-124@2x-300x193.png

260 ms

d

d

35 ms

d

d

145 ms

d

d

148 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

148 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

187 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

204 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzcXKMny.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzcXKMny.ttf

222 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

221 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

221 ms

d

d

68 ms

d

d

68 ms

d

d

65 ms

d

d

71 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

228 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

219 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

228 ms

Accessibility Review

lovingtouchvets.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lovingtouchvets.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lovingtouchvets.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovingtouchvets.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lovingtouchvets.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lovingtouchvets.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Loving Touch Vets. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: