Tools & Wizards About Us
lowervalleyprocessing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

lowervalleyprocessing.com

Lower Valley Processing - Quality meat processing and family owned since 1974.

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

427 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

246 ms

lowervalleyprocessing.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lowervalleyprocessing.com homepage info - get ready to check Lower Valley Processing best content right away, or after learning these important things about lowervalleyprocessing.com

Lower Valley Processing is your quality meat processing facility that is family owned and operated since 1974.

Visit lowervalleyprocessing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lowervalleyprocessing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 427 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lowervalleyprocessing.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.077

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lowervalleyprocessing.com

427 ms

css

60 ms

style.css

35 ms

superfish.css

52 ms

jquery-1.3.2.min.js

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Lowervalleyprocessing.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (427 ms) belongs to the original domain Lowervalleyprocessing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 425.1 kB (14%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lowervalleyprocessing.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

  • Original 30.5 kB
  • After minification 28.2 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 355.6 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lower Valley Processing needs image optimization as it can save up to 355.6 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 41.1 kB

  • Original 125.6 kB
  • After minification 125.2 kB
  • After compression 84.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 18.6 kB
  • After minification 18.2 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lowervalleyprocessing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (63%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lower Valley Processing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.lowervalleyprocessing.com

www.lowervalleyprocessing.com

427 ms

css

css

60 ms

style.css

style.css

35 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

52 ms

jquery-1.3.2.min.js

jquery-1.3.2.min.js

86 ms

hoverintent.js

hoverintent.js

56 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

53 ms

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

55 ms

script.js

script.js

59 ms

widget.css

widget.css

82 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

83 ms

awesome-weather.css

awesome-weather.css

120 ms

css

css

76 ms

styles.css

styles.css

113 ms

style.css

style.css

113 ms

wpp.css

wpp.css

114 ms

wpfront-scroll-top.min.css

wpfront-scroll-top.min.css

113 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.8.min.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.8.min.css

107 ms

style.php

style.php

337 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

119 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

107 ms

wpfront-scroll-top.min.js

wpfront-scroll-top.min.js

108 ms

counter.css

counter.css

115 ms

subscribe_sidebar.css

subscribe_sidebar.css

117 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

123 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

130 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

138 ms

superfish_settings.js.php

superfish_settings.js.php

408 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

143 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.8.min.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.8.min.js

151 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

154 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

167 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

77 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

98 ms

lower-valley-processing.png

lower-valley-processing.png

88 ms

tabs-block.png

tabs-block.png

86 ms

slider-1.jpg

slider-1.jpg

125 ms

slider-2.jpg

slider-2.jpg

139 ms

slider-3.jpg

slider-3.jpg

141 ms

slider-4.jpg

slider-4.jpg

150 ms

slider-5.jpg

slider-5.jpg

148 ms

slider-6.jpg

slider-6.jpg

148 ms

slider-shadow.png

slider-shadow.png

150 ms

body_bg.gif

body_bg.gif

164 ms

Presentation1.png

Presentation1.png

241 ms

we-accept-these-payment-methods.png

we-accept-these-payment-methods.png

175 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

174 ms

feed.png

feed.png

175 ms

11.png

11.png

173 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

22 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

31 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

30 ms

Accessibility Review

lowervalleyprocessing.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lowervalleyprocessing.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lowervalleyprocessing.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lowervalleyprocessing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lowervalleyprocessing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lowervalleyprocessing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lower Valley Processing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: