Tools & Wizards About Us
lozcliffe.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

lozcliffe.com

Intermedia arts | creative technology | research through design

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

332 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

224 ms

lozcliffe.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lozcliffe.com homepage info - get ready to check Lozcliffe best content right away, or after learning these important things about lozcliffe.com

Intermedia artist, creative technologist and researcher exploring past and present futures with sound, radio, live data and custom digital processing.

Visit lozcliffe.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lozcliffe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 332 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lozcliffe.com performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lozcliffe.com

332 ms

lozcliffe.com

390 ms

css

30 ms

style.css

109 ms

normalize-min.css

238 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Lozcliffe.com, 8% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (455 ms) belongs to the original domain Lozcliffe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 86.9 kB (33%)

Content Size

266.4 kB

After Optimization

179.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lozcliffe.com main page is 266.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 223.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 17.8 kB

  • Original 24.2 kB
  • After minification 23.8 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 68.7 kB

  • Original 223.3 kB
  • After minification 154.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lozcliffe needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.7 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 448 B

  • Original 18.9 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB
  • After compression 18.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lozcliffe.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (44%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lozcliffe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lozcliffe.com

lozcliffe.com

332 ms

lozcliffe.com

lozcliffe.com

390 ms

css

css

30 ms

style.css

style.css

109 ms

normalize-min.css

normalize-min.css

238 ms

skeleton-min.css

skeleton-min.css

310 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

455 ms

Screenshot-2024-04-15-at-17.11.12-1250x1259.png

Screenshot-2024-04-15-at-17.11.12-1250x1259.png

389 ms

nottingham-voices-480x480.jpg

nottingham-voices-480x480.jpg

257 ms

wifi-midi-sniffer-screenshot-480x480.jpg

wifi-midi-sniffer-screenshot-480x480.jpg

193 ms

mediapipe-to-osc-480x376.jpg

mediapipe-to-osc-480x376.jpg

347 ms

font

font

48 ms

Accessibility Review

lozcliffe.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lozcliffe.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lozcliffe.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lozcliffe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lozcliffe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lozcliffe.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lozcliffe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: