12.1 sec in total
1.3 sec
10.4 sec
450 ms
Visit lpflex.ae now to see the best up-to-date Lpflex content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lpflex.ae
lpflex
Visit lpflex.aeWe analyzed Lpflex.ae page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 10.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
lpflex.ae performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value18.2 s
0/100
10%
Value3,300 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value18.9 s
3/100
10%
1327 ms
323 ms
616 ms
37 ms
533 ms
Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lpflex.ae, 74% (92 requests) were made to Lpflex.com and 6% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) relates to the external source Lpflex.com.
Page size can be reduced by 149.4 kB (6%)
2.7 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Lpflex.ae main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.9 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lpflex images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lpflex.ae has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (44%)
114
64
The browser has sent 114 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lpflex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lpflex.ae
1327 ms
lpflex.com
323 ms
lpflex.com
616 ms
css2
37 ms
bootstrap.min.css
533 ms
common.css
423 ms
style.css
396 ms
header.css
430 ms
nav.css
440 ms
responsive.css
487 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
45 ms
aos.css
49 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
53 ms
style.min.css
881 ms
style.min.css
786 ms
style.min.css
797 ms
style.min.css
800 ms
style.min.css
857 ms
style.min.css
900 ms
style.min.css
1146 ms
front.css
1150 ms
styles.css
1203 ms
jquery.min.js
1361 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1248 ms
js
91 ms
js
170 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1517 ms
iconify-icon.min.js
37 ms
aos.js
20 ms
owl.carousel.js
19 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
22 ms
gsap.min.js
33 ms
front.js
1430 ms
index.js
1412 ms
index.js
1463 ms
api.js
42 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1513 ms
index.js
1632 ms
gtm.js
98 ms
embed
181 ms
lo.png
608 ms
arrow.svg
501 ms
dg.png
538 ms
richard-mille.jpg
706 ms
adidas.png
605 ms
nissan-1.png
970 ms
logo18.png
868 ms
logo5.png
902 ms
logo14.png
967 ms
hertz-1.png
1383 ms
psycho-bunny.png
1493 ms
honda.png
1811 ms
rc.png
1403 ms
rebook.png
1335 ms
hollister.png
1709 ms
logo12.png
1708 ms
logo6.png
1744 ms
logo13.png
1770 ms
logo17.png
1857 ms
logo19.png
2073 ms
chanel.png
2083 ms
shiseido.png
2712 ms
logo15.png
2133 ms
cb2.png
2666 ms
fg4.png
2226 ms
lexus.png
2671 ms
yl.png
2470 ms
nike.png
2491 ms
logo16.png
2598 ms
logo11.png
2766 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk79FO_G.woff
26 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk7PFO_G.woff
43 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk6jFO_G.woff
54 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59FO_G.woff
56 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4jE-_G.woff
56 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4aE-_G.woff
56 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59E-_G.woff
54 ms
logo3-1.png
2732 ms
logo1.png
2834 ms
af-1.png
3222 ms
js
81 ms
burberry.png
2820 ms
widget
488 ms
recaptcha__en.js
23 ms
calvin-klein.png
2831 ms
search.js
4 ms
geometry.js
8 ms
main.js
53 ms
rolex.jpg
3068 ms
SNPC.png
3267 ms
TANGARA.jpg
3031 ms
OOREDOO.jpg
3036 ms
Hermes-Logo.jpg
3358 ms
ALDO.jpg
3341 ms
website
350 ms
DKNY.jpg
3303 ms
polo-ralph.jpg
3268 ms
tissot.jpg
3286 ms
Loccitane.jpg
3391 ms
floatbutton1_0uA5KIDjSJBNGPeiRDI3YtNcjWJ9mZsPq48NM5iMzp7_jWYVkIHbMtgrDX_xil60_.css
86 ms
floatbutton1_ISMn7IPI-YZfAu5FCXPxW5r7AU1AjhlpxgSVtNThuUwKdEsY0jDg5saSe7_yLLcb_.js
139 ms
siq_mpWsf52LIPg9mU40fjRdjF6WMUs-Q0VNu4KH07GkhNZGQTRxW2eRyFJLAq9VKCYB_.ttf
20 ms
TOMMY.jpg
3265 ms
toyota-.jpg
3391 ms
eataly.jpg
3360 ms
Gucci_logo.jpg
3402 ms
Untitled-1-01.png
3311 ms
BALLY.jpg
3336 ms
Giorgio-Armani-Logo.jpg
3580 ms
HUGO-BOSS.jpg
3605 ms
LOUS-VUITTON.jpg
3557 ms
HONDA-1.png
3855 ms
Givenchy-Logo.jpg
3545 ms
sephora.jpg
3565 ms
VERSACE.jpg
3921 ms
brietling.jpg
3743 ms
line-bg.jpg
3391 ms
Dubai_Silicon_Oasis_-_Dubai_-_United_Arab_Emirates_-_panoramio_2-1.jpg
3743 ms
DSC00710.jpg
3669 ms
LPF09439.jpg
3761 ms
1715147164302.jpeg
3810 ms
1714720756979.jpeg
3993 ms
1714977224659.jpeg
3931 ms
loader.gif
3862 ms
lpflex.ae accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
lpflex.ae best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lpflex.ae SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lpflex.ae can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lpflex.ae main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lpflex.ae
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lpflex. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: