2.4 sec in total
315 ms
1.8 sec
287 ms
Click here to check amazing Lpm content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lpm.be
Planifiez votre prochain évènement Team Building Renforcez les liens au sein de votre équipe et apprenez à mieux vous connaitre en partageant des moments…
Visit lpm.beWe analyzed Lpm.be page load time and found that the first response time was 315 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
lpm.be performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value5.5 s
18/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.081
94/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
315 ms
657 ms
85 ms
169 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lpm.be, 58% (19 requests) were made to Lpm-medias.be and 24% (8 requests) were made to Lpm-durbuy.be. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (861 ms) relates to the external source Lpm-medias.be.
Page size can be reduced by 374.1 kB (26%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Lpm.be main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 279.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lpm needs image optimization as it can save up to 279.7 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lpm.be needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
28
28
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lpm. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
lpm.be
315 ms
www.lpm-durbuy.be
657 ms
preloader.css
85 ms
style.css
169 ms
css
24 ms
kayak-3.jpg
440 ms
main.min.js
330 ms
logo.png
274 ms
fietsverhuur-43-2.jpg
436 ms
oxygene2-2.png
516 ms
rappel1-3.jpg
436 ms
kids2-2.jpg
276 ms
logolpmforkids-2.png
600 ms
lpmgrill-2.jpg
521 ms
black-bull-light-2.jpg
517 ms
shdiaporama1-3.jpg
518 ms
diaposhv9-3.jpg
599 ms
lpm72-2.jpg
678 ms
groupeweekend-2.jpg
680 ms
classes2-2.png
760 ms
laatsteavond6145-2.jpg
682 ms
lpm3l-2.jpg
762 ms
lpm3-2.jpg
681 ms
jsqh6fpmq6yvn3nfuetvasvep3apndsxceaxnd4jyyehiirh3otma5dsdpt2gbwv9uaw1416h63-2.jpg
861 ms
vrije-val-2.jpg
762 ms
imgbg-2.jpg
669 ms
banner-bg.jpg
490 ms
map.png
176 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
8 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
14 ms
icomoon.woff
100 ms
analytics.js
13 ms
collect
22 ms
lpm.be accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lpm.be best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lpm.be SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lpm.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lpm.be main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lpm.be
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lpm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: