Tools & Wizards About Us
lpti.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

lpti.in

Le Passage to India | Travelling to India Best Time of Year, Travelling to India, Nepal and Bhutan

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

656 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

762 ms

lpti.in screenshot

About Website

Visit lpti.in now to see the best up-to-date Lpti content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lpti.in

Le Passage to India is India’s premier Destination Management Company and one of the best Inbound Tour Operator India, Do you know Best Time of Year for Travelling to India ? Contact to Travel company...

Visit lpti.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Lpti.in page load time and found that the first response time was 656 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lpti.in performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value740 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.9 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lpti.in

656 ms

lepassagetoindia.com

1449 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1147 ms

font-awesome.min.css

805 ms

hover.css

1010 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lpti.in, 69% (64 requests) were made to Lepassagetoindia.com and 13% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Lepassagetoindia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 888.2 kB (13%)

Content Size

6.8 MB

After Optimization

5.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lpti.in main page is 6.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 79.5 kB

  • Original 101.7 kB
  • After minification 94.2 kB
  • After compression 22.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 5.7 MB
  • After minification 5.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lpti images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 159.7 kB

  • Original 287.2 kB
  • After minification 287.2 kB
  • After compression 127.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 159.7 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 646.8 kB

  • Original 759.3 kB
  • After minification 694.9 kB
  • After compression 112.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lpti.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 646.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (58%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lpti. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lpti.in

lpti.in

656 ms

lepassagetoindia.com

lepassagetoindia.com

1449 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1147 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

805 ms

hover.css

hover.css

1010 ms

full-slider.css

full-slider.css

421 ms

custom.css

custom.css

565 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

568 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

608 ms

mashable-menu.min.css

mashable-menu.min.css

1315 ms

style.css

style.css

1511 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1357 ms

css

css

38 ms

css

css

55 ms

js

js

66 ms

js

js

43 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

21 ms

jquery-3.1.1.js

jquery-3.1.1.js

834 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

840 ms

material.min.js

material.min.js

963 ms

mashable-menu.min.js

mashable-menu.min.js

1036 ms

demo.js

demo.js

1043 ms

carousel-swipe.js

carousel-swipe.js

1152 ms

function.js

function.js

1237 ms

jquery.phancy.js

jquery.phancy.js

1244 ms

owl.carousel.min-index.js

owl.carousel.min-index.js

1274 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

1342 ms

v2.zopim.com

v2.zopim.com

110 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

209 ms

search-icon.png

search-icon.png

328 ms

language-mobile.png

language-mobile.png

326 ms

img.php

img.php

327 ms

img.php

img.php

328 ms

img.php

img.php

425 ms

close.png

close.png

417 ms

img.php

img.php

705 ms

img.php

img.php

1112 ms

img.php

img.php

681 ms

arrow-prev.png

arrow-prev.png

469 ms

arrow-next.png

arrow-next.png

568 ms

img.php

img.php

635 ms

img.php

img.php

867 ms

img.php

img.php

1159 ms

img.php

img.php

1037 ms

img.php

img.php

894 ms

img.php

img.php

1141 ms

img.php

img.php

1271 ms

img.php

img.php

1302 ms

img.php

img.php

1252 ms

inspiring-logo.png

inspiring-logo.png

1311 ms

img.php

img.php

1572 ms

img.php

img.php

1379 ms

img.php

img.php

1472 ms

img.php

img.php

1491 ms

img.php

img.php

1521 ms

blog.png

blog.png

1520 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

1566 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

1659 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

1680 ms

instra.png

instra.png

1720 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

1709 ms

blog-prev-arrow.png

blog-prev-arrow.png

1753 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

98 ms

top.png

top.png

1743 ms

img.php

img.php

1961 ms

asset_composer.js

asset_composer.js

99 ms

js

js

88 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

256 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

83 ms

NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf

NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf

201 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffGjEGItzZg.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffGjEGItzZg.ttf

256 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffAzHGItzZg.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffAzHGItzZg.ttf

255 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCGItzZg.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCGItzZg.ttf

298 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGItzZg.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGItzZg.ttf

297 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffEDBGItzZg.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffEDBGItzZg.ttf

298 ms

NaPFcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMbe0IhDYZyZ.ttf

NaPFcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMbe0IhDYZyZ.ttf

299 ms

NaPFcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMbetIlDYZyZ.ttf

NaPFcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMbetIlDYZyZ.ttf

296 ms

NaPAcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMbWD6xT.ttf

NaPAcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMbWD6xT.ttf

297 ms

NaPFcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMbepI5DYZyZ.ttf

NaPFcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMbepI5DYZyZ.ttf

319 ms

NaPFcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMbewI1DYZyZ.ttf

NaPFcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMbewI1DYZyZ.ttf

319 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1670 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

195 ms

Nyala_4.woff

Nyala_4.woff

1581 ms

img.php

img.php

1832 ms

img.php

img.php

1651 ms

img.php

img.php

1679 ms

collect

collect

48 ms

collect

collect

46 ms

img.php

img.php

1670 ms

img.php

img.php

1679 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

15 ms

collect

collect

43 ms

62 ms

Accessibility Review

lpti.in accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lpti.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lpti.in SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lpti.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lpti.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lpti.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lpti. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: