Tools & Wizards About Us
lrdg.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

lrdg.org

Long Range Desert Group Preservation Society - Home

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

153 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

242 ms

lrdg.org screenshot

About Website

Visit lrdg.org now to see the best up-to-date Lrdg content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lrdg.org

Preservation Society dedicated to keeping ww2 history alive and to educate people about the Long Range Desert Group

Visit lrdg.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Lrdg.org page load time and found that the first response time was 153 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lrdg.org performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.088

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lrdg.org

153 ms

w3.css

36 ms

css

33 ms

css

49 ms

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Lrdg.org, 11% (2 requests) were made to W3schools.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Lrdg.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 59.3 kB (7%)

Content Size

851.9 kB

After Optimization

792.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lrdg.org main page is 851.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 816.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 25.9 kB
  • After minification 24.1 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 38.9 kB

  • Original 816.9 kB
  • After minification 778.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lrdg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 452 B

  • Original 3.0 kB
  • After minification 3.0 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 452 B or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 530 B

  • Original 6.0 kB
  • After minification 6.0 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lrdg.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (29%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lrdg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lrdg.org

lrdg.org

153 ms

w3.css

w3.css

36 ms

css

css

33 ms

css

css

49 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

styles.css

styles.css

69 ms

w3.js

w3.js

37 ms

nav.html

nav.html

63 ms

Facebook-logo-4077877524.png

Facebook-logo-4077877524.png

348 ms

lrdg-breaker.jpg

lrdg-breaker.jpg

744 ms

lrdg-cap-badge.jpg

lrdg-cap-badge.jpg

231 ms

lrdg-truck1942.jpg

lrdg-truck1942.jpg

248 ms

header.html

header.html

79 ms

footer.html

footer.html

87 ms

lrdg-banner.png

lrdg-banner.png

1791 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

18 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

23 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

12 ms

Accessibility Review

lrdg.org accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lrdg.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lrdg.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lrdg.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lrdg.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lrdg.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lrdg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: