Tools & Wizards About Us
lrngo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

lrngo.com

Free Learning Exchange - Buy, Sell, Trade Languages, Tutoring & Skills - LRNGO

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

104 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

242 ms

lrngo.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lrngo.com homepage info - get ready to check LRNGO best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about lrngo.com

Learn and exchange languages, knowledge, and lifelong learning skills locally and worldwide. Meet in person or online to take lessons or match up.

Visit lrngo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lrngo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lrngo.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.377

28/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lrngo.com

104 ms

lrngo.com

376 ms

gtm.js

60 ms

9294fb1b-d262-435a-b2d4-face53101a73.js

54 ms

jquery.1.11.2.js

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Lrngo.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (403 ms) relates to the external source Optanon.blob.core.windows.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 373.0 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lrngo.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 853.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 103.1 kB

  • Original 126.2 kB
  • After minification 111.5 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 24.9 kB

  • Original 853.2 kB
  • After minification 828.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LRNGO images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 244.4 kB

  • Original 369.4 kB
  • After minification 290.0 kB
  • After compression 125.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 244.4 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 595 B

  • Original 33.5 kB
  • After minification 33.5 kB
  • After compression 32.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lrngo.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (35%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LRNGO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lrngo.com

lrngo.com

104 ms

lrngo.com

lrngo.com

376 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

60 ms

9294fb1b-d262-435a-b2d4-face53101a73.js

9294fb1b-d262-435a-b2d4-face53101a73.js

54 ms

jquery.1.11.2.js

jquery.1.11.2.js

126 ms

jquery.scrollbox.js

jquery.scrollbox.js

115 ms

typeahead.jquery.js

typeahead.jquery.js

176 ms

typeahead.bundle.js

typeahead.bundle.js

177 ms

bloodhound.js

bloodhound.js

145 ms

bootstrap-select.js

bootstrap-select.js

178 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

180 ms

lrngo.min.css

lrngo.min.css

165 ms

typeaheadjs.min.css

typeaheadjs.min.css

179 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

200 ms

css

css

51 ms

LRNGO-Logo.png

LRNGO-Logo.png

102 ms

Beta.png

Beta.png

99 ms

academicslanding.jpg

academicslanding.jpg

163 ms

home_page1.jpg

home_page1.jpg

138 ms

home_page2.jpg

home_page2.jpg

110 ms

home_page4.jpg

home_page4.jpg

139 ms

lrngo-youtube-video.png

lrngo-youtube-video.png

109 ms

create-profile.jpg

create-profile.jpg

109 ms

teach.jpg

teach.jpg

162 ms

earn-money.jpg

earn-money.jpg

161 ms

search.jpg

search.jpg

161 ms

contact.jpg

contact.jpg

178 ms

learn.jpg

learn.jpg

178 ms

GiordanaS.jpg

GiordanaS.jpg

186 ms

RomanM.jpg

RomanM.jpg

187 ms

ChelseaF.jpg

ChelseaF.jpg

185 ms

WalterA.jpg

WalterA.jpg

188 ms

CristyA.jpg

CristyA.jpg

212 ms

2012-award-web.gif

2012-award-web.gif

211 ms

LogoRA2.jpg

LogoRA2.jpg

220 ms

HoustonChronicle.jpg

HoustonChronicle.jpg

220 ms

houston_business_journal.jpg

houston_business_journal.jpg

221 ms

LRNGO-RiceAlliance.jpg

LRNGO-RiceAlliance.jpg

223 ms

SXSWedu.gif

SXSWedu.gif

245 ms

HTC_Houston.png

HTC_Houston.png

246 ms

BusinessMakersRadio.jpg

BusinessMakersRadio.jpg

253 ms

tielogo.png

tielogo.png

254 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

263 ms

js

js

90 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

81 ms

optanon.css

optanon.css

403 ms

5156.js

5156.js

58 ms

icons.svg

icons.svg

155 ms

icons.woff

icons.woff

178 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

30 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

43 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

59 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

56 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

57 ms

EU

EU

102 ms

in.php

in.php

113 ms

Accessibility Review

lrngo.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

lrngo.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lrngo.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lrngo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lrngo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lrngo.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LRNGO. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: