Tools & Wizards About Us
lrp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

lrp.com

LRP Media Group

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

750 ms

Page Rendered

437 ms

lrp.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing LRP content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lrp.com

Discover the education and federal communities’ most trusted source for practical and legal compliance guidance.

Visit lrp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lrp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lrp.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lrp.com

14 ms

lrp.com

14 ms

www.lrp.com

23 ms

style.css

3 ms

bootstrap.min.css

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Lrp.com, 23% (14 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (344 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 126.8 kB (13%)

Content Size

961.2 kB

After Optimization

834.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lrp.com main page is 961.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 798.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 36.2 kB

  • Original 45.3 kB
  • After minification 39.7 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 74.9 kB

  • Original 798.9 kB
  • After minification 724.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LRP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 15.1 kB

  • Original 114.5 kB
  • After minification 114.5 kB
  • After compression 99.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 600 B

  • Original 2.5 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lrp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 600 B or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (44%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LRP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lrp.com

lrp.com

14 ms

lrp.com

lrp.com

14 ms

www.lrp.com

www.lrp.com

23 ms

style.css

style.css

3 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

44 ms

css

css

43 ms

css

css

58 ms

zjp7fwg.css

zjp7fwg.css

99 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

54 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

21 ms

mm.js

mm.js

25 ms

reloadcaptchaimage.js

reloadcaptchaimage.js

25 ms

4487427.js

4487427.js

82 ms

p.css

p.css

32 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

87 ms

lrp_backtotop_100x100.png

lrp_backtotop_100x100.png

28 ms

embed

embed

344 ms

index_comparably-bg.jpg

index_comparably-bg.jpg

48 ms

triangles-bg.jpg

triangles-bg.jpg

83 ms

lrp-brand-institute.jpg

lrp-brand-institute.jpg

45 ms

lrp-brand-sec.jpg

lrp-brand-sec.jpg

56 ms

lrp-brand-directstep.jpg

lrp-brand-directstep.jpg

82 ms

lrp-brand-edwebinars.jpg

lrp-brand-edwebinars.jpg

55 ms

lrp-brand-sa.jpg

lrp-brand-sa.jpg

55 ms

lrp-brand-title1.jpg

lrp-brand-title1.jpg

55 ms

lrp-brand-lrpmediagroup.jpg

lrp-brand-lrpmediagroup.jpg

148 ms

lrp-brand-fdr.jpg

lrp-brand-fdr.jpg

149 ms

lrp-brand-cyberfeds.jpg

lrp-brand-cyberfeds.jpg

148 ms

lrp-brand-fedwebinars.jpg

lrp-brand-fedwebinars.jpg

147 ms

lrp-brand-manageradvantage.jpg

lrp-brand-manageradvantage.jpg

144 ms

lrp-brand-fpg.jpg

lrp-brand-fpg.jpg

148 ms

linkedin-icon.png

linkedin-icon.png

162 ms

facebook-icon.png

facebook-icon.png

161 ms

instagram-icon.png

instagram-icon.png

162 ms

comparably-icon.png

comparably-icon.png

161 ms

d

d

44 ms

d

d

143 ms

d

d

147 ms

d

d

53 ms

d

d

147 ms

d

d

79 ms

banner.js

banner.js

146 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

237 ms

fb.js

fb.js

179 ms

4487427.js

4487427.js

207 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

177 ms

js

js

143 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

139 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

110 ms

komito.js

komito.js

110 ms

d

d

48 ms

d

d

34 ms

d

d

30 ms

d

d

30 ms

d

d

34 ms

d

d

33 ms

d

d

49 ms

collect

collect

19 ms

js

js

58 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

178 ms

Accessibility Review

lrp.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

lrp.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lrp.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lrp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lrp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lrp.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LRP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: