1.8 sec in total
176 ms
950 ms
660 ms
Visit ls.livingsecurity.com now to see the best up-to-date Ls Living Security content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ls.livingsecurity.com
Unify Human Risk Management: Total visibility into all user risk across your cybersecurity tools to drive proactive, efficient action. The first and only.
Visit ls.livingsecurity.comWe analyzed Ls.livingsecurity.com page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
ls.livingsecurity.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value630 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
176 ms
248 ms
48 ms
206 ms
232 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ls.livingsecurity.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to No-cache.hubspot.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (489 ms) relates to the external source Livingsecurity.com.
Page size can be reduced by 232.3 kB (18%)
1.3 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Ls.livingsecurity.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 806.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 183.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ls Living Security images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ls.livingsecurity.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (43%)
69
39
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ls Living Security. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.livingsecurity.com
176 ms
layout.min.css
248 ms
main.css
48 ms
theme-overrides.css
206 ms
Home_Page_2023.css
232 ms
slick-theme.min.css
210 ms
slick-min.min.css
225 ms
slick.min.css
81 ms
v2mods.min.css
102 ms
module_49878423921_Global_Community_Link.min.css
124 ms
module_114184992625_LS-Simple_Text_CTA_Image_With_FullWidth.min.css
166 ms
module_113661875266_LS-Logo_Slider_With_Text.min.css
181 ms
module_77694210891_2022_Footer.min.css
204 ms
js
117 ms
81037.js
67 ms
track.js
66 ms
36a11e5302.js
79 ms
current.js
232 ms
embed.js
74 ms
jquery351.min.js
463 ms
project.js
221 ms
main.min.js
489 ms
module_77599298853_2022_menu.min.js
455 ms
module_77694210891_2022_Footer.min.js
487 ms
5319473.js
404 ms
index.js
321 ms
all.css
95 ms
98a222fa-80a4-431b-9ebd-c29856f7dfb3.png
158 ms
cead5a28-2dcf-4eaa-a360-bf7ea5e83b88.png
163 ms
Logo%20(2).svg
148 ms
hamburger.svg
155 ms
Group%2010.svg
152 ms
Group%209.svg
157 ms
Group%2011.svg
160 ms
lock-2.png
163 ms
Eab_global_logo.png
198 ms
Pfizer_transparent.png
203 ms
rubrik-logo.png
202 ms
VillageMD-Logo-Hor-CMYK-RT.png
202 ms
highmark-health.png
321 ms
AmerisourceBergen-logo-2023.png
237 ms
Verizon-Logo.png
236 ms
LOGO-LexisNexis-500wide-FLAT2.png
236 ms
Biogen_logo_logotype_symbol.png
265 ms
1024px-Sony_logo.svg.png
264 ms
EmberLogo-250.png
264 ms
charles-schwab-corporation-logo-3D61351A91-seeklogo.com.png
265 ms
1024px-HP_logo_2012.svg.png
265 ms
Raymond_James_Financial_Logo.png
310 ms
Northrop-Grumman-full-logo-2020.png
303 ms
Target-Logo.png
339 ms
de-logo-share.png
305 ms
JPMorgan.png
298 ms
LogMeIn.png
327 ms
Philips_logo_logotype_emblem.png
327 ms
t-mobile-logo-ntm.png
336 ms
Atlassian-horizontal-blue.png
330 ms
badges_2022_Gold.png
344 ms
CyberSecurityAward-2022.png
298 ms
2022BPTWBadge_General_ATX_FullColor.png
208 ms
Cybersecurity%20Breakthrough%20Award.png
207 ms
2022Q1_Security%20Awareness%20And%20Training%20Solutions_176325-1.png
219 ms
Living%20Security%20Logo.svg
211 ms
website-hero-image-522x730.png
179 ms
regular.woff
182 ms
600.woff
183 ms
700.woff
193 ms
5271.js
76 ms
collectedforms.js
69 ms
5319473.js
76 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
106 ms
fb.js
56 ms
conversations-embed.js
53 ms
5319473.js
97 ms
ls.livingsecurity.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ls.livingsecurity.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ls.livingsecurity.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ls.livingsecurity.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ls.livingsecurity.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ls.livingsecurity.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ls Living Security. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: